ArticleArchives of virology2008
Recommendations for the classification of group A rotaviruses using all 11 genomic RNA segments.
Article in Archives of virology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 293 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
293 citing papers in PubMed, 762 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Long-Term Survival of Human Enteric Virus Surrogates (Murine Norovirus, Rhesus Rotavirus, and Porcine Sapovirus) in Bottled Drinking Water.Food and environmental virology · 2026Article
- Bluetongue virus: current perspectives on characterisation and the need to formalise nomenclature in an era of rapidly evolving technology.The Journal of general virology · 2026Review
- Article
- Genetic Diversity and Evolution of Porcine Rotavirus Species A in Guangxi Province, Southern China, Between 2022 and 2025.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Whole-genome characterization and pathogenicity of novel human-porcine reassortant rotavirus strains G9P[7] and G1P[7] in China.Veterinary research · 2026Article
- Molecular Epidemiological Survey of Porcine Rotavirus in the Guangxi Region from 2020 to 2025 and Isolation and Identification of the G9P[23] Strain CH-GXGL-PoRV-3151-2021.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- High genetic diversity of porcine rotavirus A, B, and C in Hungary with putative novel VP4 genotypes.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
- Article
- Novel 20th century rotavirus alphagastroenteritidis strains identified in formalin-fixed and ethanol-preserved museum specimens.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Simultaneous expression of three G genotypes of VP7 proteins in a recombinant porcine rotavirus confers protective immunity against multiple rotavirus infections.Journal of virology · 2026Article
- From siege to spillover: how Gaza's health crisis threatens global infection spread.International journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Generation of G9 genotype porcine rotavirus using reverse genetics system and its application for antiviral screen and vaccine development.Virologica Sinica · 2026Article
- Factors contributing to the frequent interspecies transmission of G4P[6]Microbial genomics · 2026Article
- Whole-Genome Characterization of Rare Artiodactyl-Like G10P [14] and G8P [14] Rotavirus a Strains Detected in Pediatric Gastroenteritis Cases in Hokkaido Prefecture, Japan.Journal of medical virology · 2026Article
- Feline Rotavirus A as a Source of Spillover Infections to Humans: An In-Depth Analysis of Molecular Epidemiological Evidence.Viruses · 2026Review
- Rotavirus Outbreak Traced in Clinical, Environmental, and Food Matrices: Whole Genomic Characterization of an Equine-like G3P[8] Genotype.Food and environmental virology · 2026Article
- Article
- Genetic and antigenic diversity of rotavirus A in faeces from Danish pigs.Virus evolution · 2026Article
- Co-detection and genomic characterization of avian rotavirus A, avian orthoreovirus, and chicken megrivirus-C using nontargeted metagenomic surveillance in Indian broiler chickens.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
233 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 17 institutions in 9 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Recently, a classification system was proposed for rotaviruses in which all the 11 genomic RNA segments are used (Matthijnssens et al. in J Virol 82:3204-3219, 2008). Based on nucleotide identity cut-off percentages, different genotypes were defined for each genome segment. A nomenclature for the comparison of complete rotavirus genomes was considered in which the notations Gx-P[x]-Ix-Rx-Cx-Mx-Ax-Nx-Tx-Ex-Hx are used for the VP7-VP4-VP6-VP1-VP2-VP3-NSP1-NSP2-NSP3-NSP4-NSP5/6 encoding genes, respectively. This classification system is an extension of the previously applied genotype-based system which made use of the rotavirus gene segments encoding VP4, VP7, VP6, and NSP4. In order to assign rotavirus strains to one of the established genotypes or a new genotype, a standard procedure is proposed in this report. As more human and animal rotavirus genomes will be completely sequenced, new genotypes for each of the 11 gene segments may be identified. A Rotavirus Classification Working Group (RCWG) including specialists in molecular virology, infectious diseases, epidemiology, and public health was formed, which can assist in the appropriate delineation of new genotypes, thus avoiding duplications and helping minimize errors. Scientists discovering a potentially new rotavirus genotype for any of the 11 gene segments are invited to send the novel sequence to the RCWG, where the sequence will be analyzed, and a new nomenclature will be advised as appropriate. The RCWG will update the list of classified strains regularly and make this accessible on a website. Close collaboration with the Study Group Reoviridae of the International Committee on the Taxonomy of Viruses will be maintained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.