Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18604285›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2008

Pervasive and persistent redundancy among duplicated genes in yeast.

E Jedediah Dean, Jerel C Davis, Ronald W Davis, Dmitri A Petrov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 113 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
113citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

113 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Paralogs of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Antioxidant Response ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

E Jedediah DeanStanford Genome Technology Center, Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America. ejdean@stanford.edu
Jerel C Davis
Ronald W Davis
Dmitri A Petrov

Funding

WHOLE YEAST GENOME TRANSCRIPTIONAL AND FUNCTIONAL GENE MAPS--A FEASIBILITY STUDYP01HG000205 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HOWE, ROGER THOMAS, JI, HANLEE P · 1990 to 2016
$120.9M
Supplement to Enhance Wellness and Resiliency in the Graduate EnvironmentT32GM007276 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MORRISON, ASHBY J. · 1985 to 2023
$32.9M
INSTITUTIONAL TRAINING GRANT IN GENOME SCIENCET32HG000044 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MICHAEL P. SNYDER · 1995 to 2026
$32.2M
COMPUTATIONAL METHODS FOR PROTEOMIC ANALYSISK22HG000044 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI GIDDINGS, MORGAN CORINNE · 2000 to 2005
$1.3M
Patterns of background nucleotide substitution in the human lineageR01GM077368 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PETROV, DMITRI · 2006 to 2010
$989k
NHGRI NIH HHS HG00044NHGRI NIH HHS K22 HG000044NHGRI NIH HHS P01 HG000205NHGRI NIH HHS P01HG000205NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG000044NIGMS NIH HHS GM07276NIGMS NIH HHS GM077368NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM077368NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007276
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The loss of functional redundancy is the key process in the evolution of duplicated genes. Here we systematically assess the extent of functional redundancy among a large set of duplicated genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We quantify growth rate in rich medium for a large number of S. cerevisiae strains that carry single and double deletions of duplicated and singleton genes. We demonstrate that duplicated genes can maintain substantial redundancy for extensive periods of time following duplication ( approximately 100 million years). We find high levels of redundancy among genes duplicated both via the whole genome duplication and via smaller scale duplications. Further, we see no evidence that two duplicated genes together contribute to fitness in rich medium substantially beyond that of their ancestral progenitor gene. We argue that duplicate genes do not often evolve to behave like singleton genes even after very long periods of time.

Indexed as

Gene DuplicationGenes, DuplicateGenes, FungalEvolution, MolecularGene Expression Regulation, FungalModels, GeneticSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID18604285
PMCPMC2440806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.