Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18602443›Full record

ReviewProgress in neurobiology2008

The injured nervous system: a Darwinian perspective.

Zachary M Weil, Greg J Norman, A Courtney DeVries, Randy J Nelson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Progress in neurobiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Knowledge gaps in Alzheimer's disease immune biomarker research.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. A review of the alleged health hazards of monosodium glutamate.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2019
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zachary M WeilDepartments of Psychology and Neuroscience, Institute for Behavioral Medicine Research, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. Weil.20@osu.edu
Greg J Norman
A Courtney DeVries
Randy J Nelson
Institute for Behavioral Medicine · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

Photoperiod Brain and BehaviorR01MH057535 · NIMH · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI NELSON, RANDY J. · 1997 to 2012
$3.3M
Psychosocial Influences on NociceptionR01NR010806 · NINR · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DEVRIES, ANNE COURTNEY · 2008 to 2012
$1.8M
Effects of social factors on cardiac arrest outcomeR01HL080249 · NHLBI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DEVRIES, ANNE COURTNEY · 2006 to 2009
$1.4M
SOCIOBIOLOGICAL FACTORS IN EXPERIMENTAL STROKE OUTCOMER01NS040267 · NINDS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DEVRIES, ANNE COURTNEY · 2000 to 2004
$1.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL 080249NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL080249NIMH NIH HHS MH 57535NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH057535NINDS NIH HHS NS 40267NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS040267NINR NIH HHS R01 NR010806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much of the permanent damage that occurs in response to nervous system damage (trauma, infection, ischemia, etc.) is mediated by endogenous secondary processes that can contribute to cell death and tissue damage (excitotoxicity, oxidative damage and inflammation). For humans to evolve mechanisms to minimize secondary pathophysiological events following CNS injuries, selection must occur for individuals who survive such insults. Two major factors limit the selection for beneficial responses to CNS insults: for many CNS disease states the principal risk factor is advanced, post-reproductive age and virtually all severe CNS traumas are fatal in the absence of modern medical intervention. An alternative hypothesis for the persistence of apparently maladaptive responses to CNS damage is that the secondary exacerbation of damage is the result of unavoidable evolutionary constraints. That is, the nervous system could not function under normal conditions if the mechanisms that caused secondary damage (e.g., excitotoxicity) in response to injury were decreased or eliminated. However, some vertebrate species normally inhabit environments (e.g., hypoxia in underground burrows) that could potentially damage their nervous systems. Yet, neuroprotective mechanisms have evolved in these animals indicating that natural selection can occur for traits that protect animals from nervous system damage. Many of the secondary processes and regeneration-inhibitory factors that exacerbate injuries likely persist because they have been adaptive over evolutionary time in the healthy nervous system. Therefore, it remains important that researchers consider the role of the processes in the healthy or developing nervous system to understand how they become dysregulated following injury.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionModels, BiologicalTrauma, Nervous SystemAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

PMID18602443
PMCPMC2662998
OpenAlexW2099610078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.