Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18599471›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2008

Imported malaria and high risk groups: observational study using UK surveillance data 1987-2006.

Adrian D Smith, David J Bradley, Valerie Smith, Marie Blaze, Ron H Behrens, Peter L Chiodini, Christopher J M Whitty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Persistence of Imported Malaria Into the United Kingdom: An Epidemiological Review of Risk Factors and At-risk Groups.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2019
    Article
  15. Observational
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Adrian D SmithHPA Malaria Reference Laboratory, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 6AU. adrian.smith@dphpc.ox.ac.uk
David J Bradley
Valerie Smith
Marie Blaze
Ron H Behrens
Peter L Chiodini
Christopher J M Whitty

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine temporal, geographic, and sociodemographic trends in case reporting and case fatality of malaria in the United Kingdom.

settingNational malaria reference laboratory surveillance data in the UK.

designObservational study using prospectively gathered surveillance data and data on destinations from the international passenger survey.

participants39,300 cases of proved malaria in the UK between 1987 and 2006.

main outcome measuresPlasmodium species; sociodemographic details (including age, sex, and country of birth and residence); mortality; destination, duration, and purpose of international travel; and use of chemoprophylaxis.

resultsReported cases of imported malaria increased significantly over the 20 years of the study; an increasing proportion was attributable to Plasmodium falciparum (P falciparum/P vivax reporting ratio 1.3:1 in 1987-91 and 5.4:1 in 2002-6). P vivax reports declined from 3954 in 1987-91 to 1244 in 2002-6. Case fatality of reported P falciparum malaria did not change over this period (7.4 deaths per 1000 reported cases). Travellers visiting friends and relatives, usually in a country in Africa or Asia from which members of their family migrated, accounted for 13 215/20 488 (64.5%) of all malaria reported, and reports were geographically concentrated in areas where migrants from Africa and South Asia to the UK have settled. People travelling for this purpose were at significantly higher risk of malaria than other travellers and were less likely to report the use of any chemoprophylaxis (odds ratio of reported chemoprophylaxis use 0.23, 95% confidence interval 0.21 to 0.25).

conclusionsDespite the availability of highly effective preventive measures, the preventable burden from falciparum malaria has steadily increased in the UK while vivax malaria has decreased. Provision of targeted and appropriately delivered preventive messages and services for travellers from migrant families visiting friends and relatives should be a priority.

Indexed as

TravelAdultAfricaAntimalarialsAsiaFemaleHumansMalariaMalaria, FalciparumMalaria, VivaxMaleProspective StudiesResidence CharacteristicsRisk FactorsUnited KingdomAntimalarials

Identifiers

PMID18599471
PMCPMC2453297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.