ArticleHeart failure clinics2008
Computational modeling for bedside application.
Article in Heart failure clinics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Finite element method (FEM), mechanobiology and biomimetic scaffolds in bone tissue engineering.International journal of biological sciences · 2011Review
- Ventricular dilation and electrical dyssynchrony synergistically increase regional mechanical nonuniformity but not mechanical dyssynchrony: a computational model.Circulation. Heart failure · 2010Article
- Current progress in patient-specific modeling.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advances in computer power, novel diagnostic and therapeutic medical technologies, and an increasing knowledge of pathophysiology from gene to organ systems make it increasingly feasible to apply multiscale patient-specific modeling based on proven disease mechanisms. Such models may guide and predict the response to therapy in many areas of medicine. This is an exciting and relatively new approach, for which efficient methods and computational tools are of the utmost importance. Investigators have designed patient-specific models in almost all areas of human physiology. Not only will these models be useful in clinical settings to predict and optimize the outcome from surgery and non-interventional therapy, but they will also provide pathophysiologic insights from the cellular level to the organ system level. Models, therefore, will provide insight as to why specific interventions succeed or fail.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.