Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18598366›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2008

Deducing topology of protein-protein interaction networks from experimentally measured sub-networks.

Ling Yang, Thomas M Vondriska, Zhangang Han, W Robb Maclellan, James N Weiss, Zhilin Qu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ling YangDepartment of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA . lyang@mednet.ucla.edu
Thomas M Vondriska
Zhangang Han
W Robb Maclellan
James N Weiss
Zhilin Qu

Funding

Novel mechanisms of tyrosine kinase signaling in heartR01HL087132 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI VONDRISKA, THOMAS M. · 2007 to 2011
$2.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL087132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProtein-protein interaction networks are commonly sampled using yeast two hybrid approaches. However, whether topological information reaped from these experimentally-measured sub-networks can be extrapolated to complete protein-protein interaction networks is unclear.

resultsBy analyzing various experimental protein-protein interaction datasets, we found that they are not random samples of the parent networks. Based on the experimental bait-prey behaviors, our computer simulations show that these non-random sampling features may affect the topological information. We tested the hypothesis that a core sub-network exists within the experimentally sampled network that better maintains the topological characteristics of the parent protein-protein interaction network. We developed a method to filter the experimentally sampled network to result in a core sub-network that more accurately reflects the topology of the parent network. These findings have fundamental implications for large-scale protein interaction studies and for our understanding of the behavior of cellular networks.

conclusionThe topological information from experimental measured networks network as is may not be the correct source for topological information about the parent protein-protein interaction network. We define a core sub-network that more accurately reflects the topology of the parent network.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerSystems TheoryAnimalsCell Physiological PhenomenaCluster AnalysisComputer SimulationDatabases, ProteinHumansProtein Interaction MappingProteomicsSample SizeTwo-Hybrid System Techniques

Identifiers

PMID18598366
PMCPMC2474618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.