Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18596971›Full record

ArticlePloS one2008

An evaluation of commercial fluorescent bead-based luminex cytokine assays.

Joel Fleury Djoba Siawaya, Teri Roberts, Chantal Babb, Gillian Black, Hawa Jande Golakai, Kim Stanley, Nchinya Bennedict Bapela, Eileen Hoal, Shreemanta Parida, Paul van Helden and 1 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Circulating Inflammation Markers and Pancreatic Cancer Risk: A Prospective Case-Cohort Study in Japan.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Biomarkers in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome.Annals of translational medicine · 2019
    Review
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Joel Fleury Djoba SiawayaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Stellenbosch University Cape-Town, Stellenbosch, South Africa. joe@sun.ac.za
Teri Roberts
Chantal Babb
Gillian Black
Hawa Jande Golakai
Kim Stanley
Nchinya Bennedict Bapela
Eileen Hoal
Shreemanta Parida
Paul van Helden
Gerhard Walzl

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent introduction of fluorescent bead-based technology, allowing the measurement of multiples analytes in a single 25-50 microl sample has revolutionized the study of cytokine responses. However, such multiplex approaches may compromise the ability of these assays to accurately measure actual cytokine levels. This study evaluates the performance of three commercially available multiplex cytokine fluorescent bead-based immunoassays (Bio-Rad's Cytokine 17-plex kit; LINCO Inc's 29-plex kit; and RnD System's Fluorokine-Multi Analyte Profiling (MAP) base kit A and B). The LINCO Inc kit was found to be the most sensitive assay for measuring concentrations of multiple recombinant cytokines in samples that had been spiked with serial dilutions of the standard provided by the manufacturer, followed respectively by the RnD Fluorokine-(MAP) and Bio-Rad 17-plex kits. A positive correlation was found in the levels of IFN-gamma measured in antigen stimulated whole blood culture supernatants by the LINCO Inc 29-plex, RnD Fluorokine-(MAP) and RnD system IFN-gamma Quantikine ELISA kits across a panel of controls and stimulated samples. Researchers should take the limitation of such multiplexed assays into account when planning experiments and the most appropriate use for these tests may currently be as screening tools for the selection of promising markers for analysis by more sensitive techniques.

Indexed as

Fluorescent Antibody TechniqueCytokinesHumansIndicators and ReagentsReagent Kits, DiagnosticSensitivity and SpecificityCytokinesIndicators and ReagentsReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID18596971
PMCPMC2432042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.