Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18596912›Full record

ArticlePPAR research2008

PPARgamma and MEK Interactions in Cancer.

Elke Burgermeister, Rony Seger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PPAR research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Frontiers in physiology · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Chemotherapy and chemoprevention by thiazolidinediones.BioMed research international · 2015
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Elke BurgermeisterDepartment of Medicine II, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University, 81675 Munich, Germany.
Rony Seger
Klinikum rechts der Isar · DEWeizmann Institute of Science · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARgamma) exerts multiple functions in determination of cell fate, tissue metabolism, and host immunity. Two synthetic PPARgamma ligands (rosiglitazone and pioglitazone) were approved for the therapy of type-2 diabetes mellitus and are expected to serve as novel cures for inflammatory diseases and cancer. However, PPARgamma and its ligands exhibit a janus-face behaviour as tumor modulators in various systems, resulting in either tumor suppression or tumor promotion. This may be in part due to signaling crosstalk to the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades. The genomic activity of PPARgamma is modulated, in addition to ligand binding, by phosphorylation of a serine residue by MAPKs, such as extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases-1/2 (ERK-1/2), or by nucleocytoplasmic compartmentalization through the ERK activators MAPK kinases-1/2 (MEK-1/2). PPARgamma ligands themselves activate the ERK cascade through nongenomic and often PPARgamma-independent signaling. In the current review, we discuss the molecular mechanisms and physiological implications of the crosstalk of PPARgamma with MEK-ERK signaling and its potential as a novel drug target for cancer therapy in patients.

Identifiers

PMID18596912
PMCPMC2440494
OpenAlexW2024761791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.