Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18596853›Full record

ReviewTransactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association2008

In search of the holy grail of antifungal therapy.

Stanley W Chapman, Donna C Sullivan, John D Cleary

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Production, Detection, Extraction, and Quantification of Polyene Antibiotics.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Immune-Stimulatory and Therapeutic Activity ofJournal of immunology research · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Mechanistic Targets of Antifungal Agents: An Overview.Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry · 2016
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stanley W ChapmanDepartment of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi 39216, USA.
Donna C Sullivan
John D Cleary
University of Mississippi Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ideal antifungal agent remains an elusive goal for treatment of life-threatening systemic fungal infections. Such an agent would have broad antifungal activity, low rates of resistance, flexible routes of administration, few associated adverse events, and limited drug-drug interactions. Only three of the seven classes of antifungal agents currently available are suitable for treatment of systemic infection: the polyenes, the azoles, and the echinocandins. None match all the characteristics of an ideal agent, the Holy Grail of antifungal therapy. Academia and industry need to collaborate in the search for new lead antifungal compounds using traditional screening methods as well as the new pharmacogenomics methods. Enhancing efficacy and reducing toxicity of the currently available therapeutic agents is also another important avenue of study. As an example, the Mycosis Research Center at the University of Mississippi Medical Center has identified pyogenic polyenes in commercial preparations of amphotericin B deoxycholate which correlate with infusion related toxicities. A highly purified formulation of amphotericin B appears promising, with a better therapeutic index compared to its parent compound as evidenced by results of in vitro and in vivo studies reviewed in this presentation.

Indexed as

Amphotericin BAntifungal AgentsAzolesDrug ContaminationDrug DesignFungiGenomicsHumansMycosesProteomicsAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsAzoles

Identifiers

PMID18596853
PMCPMC2394691
OpenAlexW42568365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.