Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18595582›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the National Medical Association2008

Increasing colorectal cancer screening among African Americans, linking risk perception to interventions targeting patients, communities and clinicians.

Stephanie H Ward, Karen Lin, Brian Meyer, Sarah B Bass, Lalitha Parameswaran, Thomas F Gordon, Sheryl Burt Ruzek

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the National Medical Association, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Changes in risk perceptions in relation to self-reported colorectal cancer screening among first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer cases enrolled in a randomized trial.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2011
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Screen to Save: Results from NCI's Colorectal Cancer Outreach and Screening Initiative to Promote Awareness and Knowledge of Colorectal Cancer in Racial/Ethnic and Rural Populations.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Identifying barriers to colonoscopy screening for nonadherent African American participants in a patient navigation intervention.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2013
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Quality improvement in gastroenterology clinical practice.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2012
    Review
  15. Challenges to replicating evidence-based research in real-world settings: training African-American peers as patient navigators for colon cancer screening.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2012
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Training experiences of lay and professional patient navigators for colorectal cancer screening.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2011
    Article
  19. Perceptions of colorectal cancer screening in urban African American clinic patients: differences by gender and screening status.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2011
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephanie H WardDepartment of Medicine, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA. stephanie.ward@tuhs.temple.edu
Karen Lin
Brian Meyer
Sarah B Bass
Lalitha Parameswaran
Thomas F Gordon
Sheryl Burt Ruzek
Temple University · US

Funding

"Using Perceptual Mapping to Develop Low Literacy CRC Screening Decision Aids"R21CA120122 · NCI · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI GORDON, THOMAS FRANK · 2007 to 2008
$330k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA120122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening remains significantly underutilized by African Americans despite their increased risk compared to whites. The purpose of this article is to review recent research on patterns of screening, perceptions of CRC screening methods and outcomes of seven intervention trials specifically designed to increase screening among African Americans in light of the recommendation of the American College of Gastroenterologists to make colonoscopy the screening method of choice for this population. This review shows that progress has been made in understanding the complexity of perceived barriers to CRC screening among African Americans. Interventions that used community-based education targeting individuals and clinically based education targeting clinicians showed modest increases in screening rates. Targeting entire communities did not show significant results. However, because intervention studies use not only different types of interventions but different screening outcome measures, results are not easily comparable. While there is growing evidence that interventions can increase the use of fecal occult blood test (FOBT), it is not yet known if similar interventions can increase rates of screening colonoscopy. Clinicians, patients and policymakers also need to consider the array of social, cultural and financial issues associated with CRC screening in African-American communities.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CarePerceptionBlack or African AmericanColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsEducation, Medical, ContinuingGastroenterologyHealth EducationHumansMass ScreeningOccult BloodRisk

Identifiers

PMID18595582
PMCPMC9036490
OpenAlexW1865005974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.