Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18595016›Full record

Trial reportGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2008

Rationale for gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy in the treatment of gastric cancer.

Alvaro Díaz de Liaño, Concepción Yarnoz, Rubén Aguilar, Cristina Artieda, Héctor Ortiz

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Do we need a "three-star" hospital to cure a gastric cancer?Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alvaro Díaz de LiañoEsophagogastric Unit, General and Digestive Surgery Department, Hospital Virgen del Camino, c/o Pintor Maeztu 2, 8C, 31008 Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.
Concepción Yarnoz
Rubén Aguilar
Cristina Artieda
Héctor Ortiz

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the surgical management of gastric cancer, D2 lymphadenectomy aims to reduce the incidence of locoregional relapse, and to increase patient survival.

methodsA prospective study was made of 126 consecutive patients operated upon for gastric cancer, with gastrectomy and D2 lymphadenectomy. Hospital morbidity and mortality, relapses, and patient survival after 5 years were studied.

resultsThe overall hospital mortality rate was 1.6%, with a mortality of 2.1% in the patients submitted to total gastrectomy. The overall morbidity rate was 29.4%. Dehiscence of the esophagojejunal anastomosis was recorded in 1.6%. The median follow-up was 73.6 months. Relapses were observed in 37% of the patients (76% in the first 2 years). Overall actuarial survival after 5 years was 52.3%, and 5-year survival in the patients with R0 resection with positive N2 lymph nodes according to the Japanese classification was 26.5%.

conclusionOur results show that D2 lymphadenectomy can be performed with low morbidity-mortality, and a 5-year survival of more than 50%. The procedure offers benefit in terms of survival for a certain percentage of patients with positive level N2 lymph nodes.

Indexed as

Lymph Node ExcisionAdenocarcinomaAgedFemaleGastrectomyHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPostoperative ComplicationsStomach Neoplasms

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.