Trial reportInternational journal of colorectal disease2008
Temperature-controlled radio frequency energy delivery (Secca procedure) for the treatment of fecal incontinence: results of a prospective study.
Trial report in International journal of colorectal disease, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical response and sustainability of treatment with temperature-controlled radiofrequency energy (Secca) in patients with faecal incontinence: 3 years follow-up.International journal of colorectal disease · 2014Trial
- Critical appraisal of international guidelines for the management of fecal incontinence in adults: is it possible to define what to do in different clinical scenarios?Techniques in coloproctology · 2022Review
- Radiofrequency in the treatment of fecal incontinence should no longer be recommended.International journal of colorectal disease · 2021Article
- Diagnosis and Management of Fecal Incontinence.Current gastroenterology reports · 2018Review
- Surgical Interventions and the Use of Device-Aided Therapy for the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence and Defecatory Disorders.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2017Review
- Update on the Management of Fecal Incontinence for the Gastroenterologist.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2016Article
- Current and emerging treatment options for fecal incontinence.Journal of clinical gastroenterology · 2014Review
- Current status: new technologies for the treatment of patients with fecal incontinence.Surgical endoscopy · 2014Review
- Temperature-controlled radiofrequency energy in patients with anal incontinence: an interim analysis of worldwide data.Gastroenterology report · 2014Article
- Current management of fecal incontinence: choosing amongst treatment options to optimize outcomes.World journal of gastroenterology · 2013Review
- An Open-Label, Noncomparative, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of NASHA/Dx Gel as a Bulking Agent for the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFecal incontinence (FI) is a debilitating condition that can be socially and personally incapacitating. A broad range of treatment options, often stepwise, are available, depending on severity. This prospective study reports a large single-centered series of patients who have benefited of temperature-controlled radio frequency (Secca) energy delivered to the anal canal. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis investigation was a single-center, nonrandomized, prospective, clinical study of a single patient group with each serving as the control. All patients had experienced FI for at least 3 months and had attempted, but were not satisfied, with the results of medical and/or surgical therapies. The study aims to evaluate changes in FI symptom scores and quality of life between the baseline and follow-up intervals.
resultsBetween March 2005 and March 2006, 15 Secca procedures were performed. All 15 patients were alive and in contact with the investigational site at time of 12 months. There were no long term complications. The mean Wexner score improved from 14.07 (+/-4.5) at baseline to 12.33 (+/-4.6) at 1 year (p=0.02). The mean fecal incontinence quality of life of life score was only improved in the depression subscore. There were no changes in endoanal ultrasound and anorectal manometry.
conclusionThis prospective trial confirmed the safety of the Secca procedure. Although we demonstrated a significant improvement in the Wexner Score, these clinical results have to be mitigated because most patients remained in the moderate incontinences category as defined by the scoring system and did not improved their quality of life excepted in the depression subscore.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18594840What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.