ArticleNature clinical practice. Endocrinology & metabolism2008
Diabetes education at diagnosis: sooner rather than later?
Article in Nature clinical practice. Endocrinology & metabolism, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Few well-designed, randomized, controlled trials have examined the clinical consequences of diabetes education at diagnosis. As a result, relatively few patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus have access to such programs. In this Practice Point commentary, I discuss the study of Davies et al., which examined the effect of a structured diabetes education intervention at diagnosis on glycemic control, weight loss, and smoking cessation during a 12-month follow-up period. A control group that received standard diabetes education and guideline-based care was also enrolled. Although glycemic control did not differ between the two groups, patients in the intervention group lost more weight and were more likely to have stopped smoking by 12 months than those in the control group. These findings suggest potential long-term benefits of early patient education. Future studies that examine long-term follow-up data from this cohort would be useful to determine whether early diabetes education has any effect on glycemia later in the disease course.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.