Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18593457›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2008

A study of candidate genes for day blindness in the standard wire haired dachshund.

Anne Caroline Wiik, Ernst-Otto Ropstad, Ellen Bjerkås, Frode Lingaas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The genetics of eye disorders in the dog.Canine genetics and epidemiology · 2014
    Review
  3. Exclusion of eleven candidate genes for ocular melanosis in Cairn terriers.Journal of negative results in biomedicine · 2013
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anne Caroline WiikDepartment of Basic Sciences and Aquatic Medicine, Division of Genetics, Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, PO Box 8146 Dep, 0033 Oslo, Norway. annecaroline.wiik@veths.no <annecaroline.wiik@veths.no>
Ernst-Otto Ropstad
Ellen Bjerkås
Frode Lingaas
Norwegian University of Life Sciences · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA genetic study was performed to identify candidate genes associated with day blindness in the standard wire haired dachshund. Based on a literature review of diseases in dogs and human with phenotypes similar to day blindness, ten genes were selected and evaluated as potential candidate genes associated with day blindness in the breed.

resultsThree of the genes, CNGB3, CNGA3 and GNAT2, involved in cone degeneration and seven genes and loci, ABCA4, RDH5, CORD8, CORD9, RPGRIP1, GUCY2D and CRX, reported to be involved in cone-rod dystrophies were studied. Polymorphic markers at each of the candidate loci were studied in a family with 36 informative offspring. The study revealed a high frequency of recombinations between the candidate marker alleles and the disease.

conclusionSince all of the markers were at the exact position of the candidate loci, and several recombinations were detected for each of the loci, all ten genes were excluded as causal for this canine, early onset cone-rod dystrophy. The described markers may, however, be useful to screen other canine resource families segregating eye diseases for association to the ten genes.

Indexed as

AnimalsDog DiseasesDogsFemaleGenotypeMaleMicrosatellite RepeatsPedigreeRecombination, GeneticVision Disorders

Identifiers

PMID18593457
PMCPMC2494547
OpenAlexW2002618559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.