Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18593388›Full record

ReviewInternational wound journal2008

Povidone-iodine: use in hand disinfection, skin preparation and antiseptic irrigation.

Piyush Durani, David Leaper

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International wound journal, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06242379 (Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of Intravitreal Injection of GMP-compliant Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell-derived Small Extracellular Vesicles in Patients With Retinitis Pigmentosa), which is not on this map. Cited by 76 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06242379 phase1 / phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of Intravitreal Injection of GMP-compliant Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell-derived Small Extracellular Vesicles in Patients With Retinitis Pigmentosa

TypeinterventionalSponsorMahidol UniversityRan2024 to 2027Enrolled15ConditionsRetinitis PigmentosaArmsGMP compliant-BM-MSC derived sEVs
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 217 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. RCT-based meta-analysis of povidone-iodine irrigation in spinal surgery: clarifying efficacy and safety.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Surgical hand antisepsis to reduce surgical site infection.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Piyush DuraniDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Burns Surgery, Nottingham City Hospital, Hucknall Road, Nottingham, UK.
David Leaper
Cardiff University · GBNottingham City Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Iodine and its antibacterial properties have been used for the prevention or management of wound infections for over 150 years. However, the use of solutions (tincture) of iodine has been replaced by the widespread use of povidone-iodine, a water-soluble compound, which is a combination of molecular iodine and polyvinylpyrrolidone. The resultant broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity is well documented and its efficacy, particularly in relation to resistant micro-organisms such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, has been shown. In the clinical environment, there is no general agreement regarding the 'best' antiseptic and the practice varies widely. This article reviews the studies that have assessed the efficacy of povidone-iodine in hand disinfection and skin preparation and its use as an antiseptic irrigant. Although there is a distinct lack of well-designed, randomised controlled trials evaluating antiseptic efficacy, selection should be based on the next best available evidence. This evidence suggests that the use of povidone-iodine as an agent of choice is dependent on the clinical need but is also likely to be influenced by personal preference.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAnti-Infective Agents, LocalAntisepsisChoice BehaviorEnemaEvidence-Based MedicineHand DisinfectionHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPatient SelectionPeritoneal LavagePovidone-IodinePreoperative CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignSkin CareAnti-Infective Agents, LocalPovidone-Iodine

Identifiers

PMID18593388
PMCPMC7951395
OpenAlexW2085513967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.