Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18591999›Full record

ArticleDrug discovery today. Disease models2007

Models of reactive oxygen species in cancer.

Weiqin Lu, Marcia A Ogasawara, Peng Huang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug discovery today. Disease models, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Life Entrapped in a Network of Atavistic Attractors: How to Find a Rescue.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Bioenergetics of life, disease and death phenomena.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. SOD2 to SOD1 switch in breast cancer.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2014
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Weiqin LuDepartment of Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Marcia A Ogasawara
Peng Huang
University of Houston · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Superoxide, ROS, and novel targets for cancer therapyR01CA085563 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI HUANG, PENG · 2001 to 2016
$3.1M
p53 in Cellular Response to ROS-Mediated DNA DamageR01CA100428 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI HUANG, PENG · 2003 to 2012
$2.7M
Mitochondrial defects and Cancer TherapeuticsR01CA109041 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI HUANG, PENG · 2004 to 2008
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA085563NCI NIH HHS R01 CA100428NCI NIH HHS R01 CA109041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increased generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) has been observed in cancer, degenerative diseases, and other pathological conditions. ROS can stimulate cell proliferation, promote genetic instability, and induce adaptive responses that enable cancer cells to maintain their malignant phenotypes. However, when cellular redox balance is severely disturbed, high levels of ROS may cause various damages leading to cell death. The studies of ROS effects on biological systems, their underlying mechanisms and therapeutic implications largely depend on proper experimental models. Here we review several in vitro and in vivo models for ROS research.

Identifiers

PMID18591999
PMCPMC2390932
OpenAlexW2039604351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.