Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18591243›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2008

Structure-function analysis of inositol hexakisphosphate-induced autoprocessing of the Vibrio cholerae multifunctional autoprocessing RTX toxin.

Katerina Prochazkova, Karla J Fullner Satchell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. ThemBio · 2022
    Article
  6. Actin Cross-Linking Effector Domain of theInfection and immunity · 2022
    Article
  7. Virulence Regulation and Innate Host Response in the Pathogenicity ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. NNature microbiology · 2018
    Article
  11. Accessory Toxins ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katerina ProchazkovaDepartment of Microbiology-Immunology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 303 East Chicago Avenue, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Karla J Fullner Satchell

Funding

Vaccines and Therapies Against BotulismU54AI057153 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI KANABROCKI, JOSEPH A. · 2003 to 2013
$87.6M
Genetic and biochemical study ov V. cholerase RTX toxinR01AI051490 · NIAID · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI SATCHELL, KARLA J F · 2003 to 2012
$3.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI 051490NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI051490NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI 057153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vibrio cholerae secretes a large virulence-associated multifunctional autoprocessing RTX toxin (MARTX(Vc)). Autoprocessing of this toxin by an embedded cysteine protease domain (CPD) is essential for this toxin to induce actin depolymerization in a broad range of cell types. A homologous CPD is also present in the large clostridial toxin TcdB and recent studies showed that inositol hexakisphosphate (Ins(1,2,3,4,5,6)P(6) or InsP(6)) stimulated the autoprocessing of TcdB dependent upon the CPD (Egerer, M., Giesemann, T., Jank, T., Satchell, K. J., and Aktories, K. (2007) J. Biol. Chem. 282, 25314-25321). In this work, the autoprocessing activity of the CPD within MARTX(Vc) is similarly found to be inducible by InsP(6). The CPD is shown to bind InsP(6) (K(d), 0.6 microm), and InsP(6) is shown to stimulate intramolecular autoprocessing at both physiological concentrations and as low as 0.01 microm. Processed CPD did not bind InsP(6) indicating that, subsequent to cleavage, the activated CPD may shift to an inactive conformation. To further pursue the mechanism of autoprocessing, conserved residues among 24 identified CPDs were mutagenized. In addition to cysteine and histidine residues that form the catalytic site, 2 lysine residues essential for InsP(6) binding and 5 lysine and arginine residues resulting in loss of activity at low InsP(6) concentrations were identified. Overall, our data support a model in which basic residues located across the CPD structure form an InsP(6) binding pocket and that the binding of InsP(6) stimulates processing by altering the CPD to an activated conformation. After processing, InsP(6) is shown to be recycled, while the cleaved CPD becomes incapable of further binding of InsP(6).

Indexed as

Models, ChemicalBacterial ToxinsCatalytic DomainCysteine EndopeptidasesPhytic AcidProtein BindingProtein Structure, TertiaryVibrio choleraeBacterial ToxinsCysteine EndopeptidasesPhytic Acid

Identifiers

PMID18591243
PMCPMC3259750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.