Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18591203›Full record

Trial reportPediatrics2008

Lamotrigine in breast milk and nursing infants: determination of exposure.

D Jeffrey Newport, Page B Pennell, Martha R Calamaras, James C Ritchie, Melanee Newman, Bettina Knight, Adele C Viguera, Joyce Liporace, Zachary N Stowe

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pediatrics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Early life nutrition.Science progress · 2018
    Review
  13. Issues for Women with Epilepsy.Neurologic clinics · 2016
    Review
  14. Mood stabilizers in pregnancy and lactation.Indian journal of psychiatry · 2015
    Review
  15. Lactation studies of anticonvulsants: a quality review.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2015
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Lamotrigine dosing for pregnant patients with bipolar disorder.The American journal of psychiatry · 2013
    Article
  19. Mixed depression in the postpartum period: diagnostic and treatment issues.Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN · 2013
    Article
  20. Antiepileptic drugs and breastfeeding.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

D Jeffrey NewportDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, 1365 Clifton Rd NE, Suite B6100, Atlanta, GA 30322. jeff.newport@emory.edu
Page B Pennell
Martha R Calamaras
James C Ritchie
Melanee Newman
Bettina Knight
Adele C Viguera
Joyce Liporace
Zachary N Stowe
Emory University · USCleveland Clinic · USMemorial Hospital · USNeurology, Inc · US

Funding

Mood and Anxiety Disorders in Pregnancy and LactationP50MH068036 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI STOWE, ZACHARY N · 2002 to 2006
$6.1M
Development PsychopharmacologyK23MH063507 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI NEWPORT, DONALD JEFFREY · 2001 to 2005
$625k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH063507NIMH NIH HHS MH-63507NIMH NIH HHS MH-68036NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH068036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlthough lamotrigine use during pregnancy has substantially increased over the past decade secondary to accumulated reproductive safety data, systematic data on lamotrigine during breastfeeding remains sparse. We sought to characterize the determinants of lamotrigine concentrations in breast milk and nursing-infant plasma. PATIENTS AND

methodsWomen who enrolled in a prospective investigation of perinatal medication pharmacokinetics, were treated with lamotrigine, and chose to continue lamotrigine while breastfeeding were included in the analysis. Breast milk samples were collected via breast pump from foremilk to hindmilk from a single breast to determine the excretion gradient and serial samples over 24 hours to determine the time course of excretion. Paired maternal/infant plasma samples were also collected. Lamotrigine concentrations in all of the samples were determined by using high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. Statistical analyses of breast milk and infant plasma concentrations and their determinants were conducted.

resultsThirty women and their nursing infants participated in the study, providing a total of 210 breast milk samples. The mean milk/plasma ratio was 41.3%. There was a nonsignificant trend for higher lamotrigine concentrations in breast milk 4 hours after the maternal dose. Infant plasma concentrations were 18.3% of maternal plasma concentrations. The theoretical infant lamotrigine dose was 0.51 mg/kg per day, and the relative infant lamotrigine dose was 9.2%. Mild thrombocytosis was present in 7 of 8 infants at the time of serum sampling. No other adverse events were observed or reported in the breastfed infants.

conclusionsConsistent with previous investigations of medications in breast milk, the lamotrigine milk/plasma ratio is highly variable. The rate of lamotrigine excretion into human breast milk is similar to that observed with other antiepileptic drugs. These data expand the extant literature on lamotrigine in breastfeeding and demonstrate relatively comparable nursing-infant exposure to lamotrigine compared with other antiepileptic drugs.

Indexed as

AdultAnticonvulsantsBreast FeedingFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLamotrigineMilk, HumanTriazinesAnticonvulsantsLamotrigineTriazines

Identifiers

PMID18591203
PMCPMC4714583
OpenAlexW2091583140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.