Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18590333›Full record

ArticleACS chemical biology2008

Ligand-binding pocket shape differences between sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptors S1P1 and S1P3 determine efficiency of chemical probe identification by ultrahigh-throughput screening.

Stephan C Schürer, Steven J Brown, Pedro J Gonzalez-Cabrera, Marie-Therese Schaeffer, Jacqueline Chapman, Euijung Jo, Peter Chase, Tim Spicer, Peter Hodder, Hugh Rosen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS chemical biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A promising carbon-11-labeled sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1-specific PET tracer for imaging vascular injury.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Chemical and genetic tools to explore S1P biology.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2014
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Academic cross-fertilization by public screening yields a remarkable class of protein phosphatase methylesterase-1 inhibitors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephan C SchürerDepartment of Scientific Computing, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California and Jupiter, Florida, USA.
Steven J Brown
Pedro J Gonzalez-Cabrera
Marie-Therese Schaeffer
Jacqueline Chapman
Euijung Jo
Peter Chase
Tim Spicer
Peter Hodder
Hugh Rosen
Screen · USScripps Research Institute · US

Funding

UHTS Implementation(Florida)U54MH084512 · NIMH · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI SCHURER, STEPHAN C · 2008 to 2013
$89.2M
Scripps Research Institute Molecular Screen Center(RMI)U54MH074404 · NIMH · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI ROSEN, HUGH · 2005 to 2007
$11.6M
S1P Receptor subtypes: Regulating lymphocyte traffickingR01AI055509 · NIAID · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI ROSEN, HUGH · 2004 to 2008
$2.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI055509NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH074404NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH084512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have studied the sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor system to better understand why certain molecular targets within a closely related family are much more tractable when identifying compelling chemical leads. Five medically important G-protein-coupled receptors for S1P regulate heart rate, coronary artery caliber, endothelial barrier integrity, and lymphocyte trafficking. Selective S1P receptor agonist probes would be of great utility to study receptor subtype-specific function. Through systematic screening of the same libraries, we identified novel selective agonist chemotypes for each of the S1P1 and S1P3 receptors. Ultrahigh-throughput screening (uHTS) for S1P1 was more effective than that for S1P3, with many selective, low nanomolar hits of proven mechanism emerging. Receptor structure modeling and ligand docking reveal differences between the receptor binding pockets, which are the basis for subtype selectivity. Novel selective agonists interact primarily in the hydrophobic pocket of the receptor in the absence of headgroup interactions. Chemistry-space and shape-based analysis of the screening libraries in combination with the binding models explain the observed differential hit rates and enhanced efficiency for lead discovery for S1P1 versus S1P3 in this closely related receptor family.

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding SitesBiosensing TechniquesCalciumCHO CellsCluster AnalysisCricetinaeCricetulusLigandsModels, MolecularMolecular ProbesOxadiazolesPhosphorylationProtein BindingProtein ConformationReceptors, LysosphingolipidCalciumLigandsMolecular ProbesOxadiazolesReceptors, Lysosphingolipid

Identifiers

PMID18590333
PMCPMC2597349
OpenAlexW140906191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.