SynthesisDer Urologe. Ausg. A2008
[Value of targeted therapy for penile cancer].
Synthesis in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Penile cancer: epidemiology and treatment.Current oncology reports · 2011Article
- [Characterization of the EGF receptor status in penile cancer : retrospective analysis of the course of the disease in 45 patients].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2009Article
- [The current state of the art of chemotherapy of penile cancer: results of a nationwide survey of German clinics].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With an incidence of 0.1-0.9/100,000 men/year, penile cancer is a rare cancer of the urogenital tract in Western Europe. At the time of initial diagnosis up to 45% of the patients already demonstrate metastatic disease and need some type of systemic treatment. Objective remission rates and 3-year survival rates of 30 and < 10%, respectively, are depressingly low. Identification of molecular targets for the introduction of molecular triggered therapies such as monoclonal antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors might improve the poor prognosis and could replace non-targeted systemic chemotherapies with a less toxic targeted therapy.However, a MEDLINE search does not identify any current clinical trial with regard to targeted therapeutic approaches in penile cancer. Based on a systematic review of the molecular events involved in the metastatic process of penile cancer, therapeutic approaches with bevacizumab or COX-2 inhibitors appear to have the greatest potential to improve the prognosis. In order to perform a prospective clinical phase 2/3 trial in such a low frequency cancer, international cooperative structures have to be established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.