ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2008
Modelling the swelling assay for aquaporin expression.
Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Wet-tip versus dry-tip regimes of osmotically driven fluid flow.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- The Water to Solute Permeability Ratio Governs the Osmotic Volume Dynamics in Beetroot Vacuoles.Frontiers in plant science · 2016Article
- Human AQP1 is a constitutively open channel that closes by a membrane-tension-mediated mechanism.Biophysical journal · 2013Article
- Water flux through human aquaporin 1: inhibition by intracellular furosemide and maximal response with high osmotic gradients.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The standard method of assaying the water transporting capability of a putative aquaporin-like entity is to express that entity in a cell of normally low water permeability and to measure the enhancement of swelling when the cell is subjected to hypo-osmotic shock. Because of the heterogeneous nature of cytoplasm, the interplay of advection and diffusion, and the coupling of internal and external media via a semipermeable elastic membrane, even simplified mathematical models can be difficult to resolve. This class of diffusion problem seems to have been but little studied. In this paper, the cell and its surround are at first modelled as perfectly-mixed phases separated by an ideal semipermeable membrane with vanishingly small elastic modulus; and the time course of swelling is evaluated analytically. This time course was found to be non-exponential, but such unexpected behavior should not seriously affect the traditional interpretation of experimental results because its short time limit is linear as in the traditional model; and normally only short time data are available. Next, the simplifications of diffusive equilibrium and of vanishing elastic modulus are examined. It is shown that diffusive equilibrium will be true only when diffusive movement of osmolyte is rather faster than the swelling and that this will probably not be the case for many assays. On the other hand, it should often be possible to neglect the elastic modulus. Finally, a more comprehensive model is formulated for a spherical cell in a hypotonic medium and the swelling behavior described in terms as a moving boundary problem (This type of moving boundary problem is often called a Stefan problem [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stefan_problem ]) in which two phases containing diffusive osmolyte are separated by a weakly-elastic ideally-semipermeable membrane, the water flux across which is linear in the osmolality difference across it. This type of behavior was evaluated numerically by finite-difference time-domain techniques and found to be qualitatively similar to that of the perfect-mixing simplification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.