Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18586941›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2008

Synthetic lethality with the dut defect in Escherichia coli reveals layers of DNA damage of increasing complexity due to uracil incorporation.

Helen Ting, Elena A Kouzminova, Andrei Kuzminov

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Synthetic lethal mutants inJournal of bacteriology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Uracil-DNA Glycosylase fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Structural and Functional Insights into UDGs.Protein and peptide letters · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Phenotypes ofJournal of bacteriology · 2017
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Helen TingDepartment of Microbiology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Elena A Kouzminova
Andrei Kuzminov
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Chromosomal death due to misincorporation of wrong material into DNAR01GM073115 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI KUZMINOV, ANDREI · 2007 to 2022
$3.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM 073115NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM073115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic lethality is inviability of a double-mutant combination of two fully viable single mutants, commonly interpreted as redundancy at an essential metabolic step. The dut-1 defect in Escherichia coli inactivates dUTPase, causing increased uracil incorporation in DNA and known synthetic lethalities [SL(dut) mutations]. According to the redundancy logic, most of these SL(dut) mutations should affect nucleotide metabolism. After a systematic search for SL(dut) mutants, we did identify a single defect in the DNA precursor metabolism, inactivating thymidine kinase (tdk), that confirmed the redundancy explanation of synthetic lethality. However, we found that the bulk of mutations interacting genetically with dut are in DNA repair, revealing layers of damage of increasing complexity that uracil-DNA incorporation sends through the chromosomal metabolism. Thus, we isolated mutants in functions involved in (i) uracil-DNA excision (ung, polA, and xthA); (ii) double-strand DNA break repair (recA, recBC, and ruvABC); and (iii) chromosomal-dimer resolution (xerC, xerD, and ftsK). These mutants in various DNA repair transactions cannot be redundant with dUTPase and instead reveal "defect-damage-repair" cycles linking unrelated metabolic pathways. In addition, two SL(dut) inserts (phoU and degP) identify functions that could act to support the weakened activity of the Dut-1 mutant enzyme, suggesting the "compensation" explanation for this synthetic lethality. We conclude that genetic interactions with dut can be explained by redundancy, by defect-damage-repair cycles, or as compensation.

Indexed as

DNA DamageChromosomes, BacterialDNA, BacterialDNA RepairEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsModels, BiologicalModels, GeneticPyrophosphatasesUracilDNA, BacterialdUTP pyrophosphataseEscherichia coli ProteinsPyrophosphatasesUracil

Identifiers

PMID18586941
PMCPMC2519533
OpenAlexW2005987896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.