Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18586863›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry2008

Predictive value of the Essen Stroke Risk Score and Ankle Brachial Index in acute ischaemic stroke patients from 85 German stroke units.

C Weimar, M Goertler, J Röther, E B Ringelstein, H Darius, D G Nabavi, In-Ha Kim, Jens Benemann, Hans-Christoph Diener, SCALA Study Group

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ankle-Brachial Index as a Predictor of Acute Ischemic Cerebrovascular Event After Central Retinal Artery Occlusion.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Association between CHADSJournal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. CHAJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. CHAMayo Clinic proceedings · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

C WeimarDepartment of Neurology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, D- 45122 Essen, Germany. stroke.med@uni-essen.de
M Goertler
J Röther
E B Ringelstein
H Darius
D G Nabavi
In-Ha Kim
Jens Benemann
Hans-Christoph Diener
SCALA Study Group
University of Duisburg-Essen · DEVivantes Klinikum · DEJohannes Wesling Klinikum Minden · DESanofi (France) · FRUniversity Hospital Magdeburg · DEUniversity of Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRisk stratification can contribute to individualised optimal secondary prevention in patients with cerebrovascular disease.

objectiveTo prospectively investigate the prediction of the Essen Stroke Risk Score (ESRS) and a pathological Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) in consecutive patients hospitalised with acute ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) in 85 neurological stroke units throughout Germany.

methods852 patients were prospectively documented on standardised case report forms, including assessment of ESRS and ABI. After 17.5 months, recurrent cerebrovascular events, functional outcome or death could be assessed in 729 patients predominantly via central telephone interview.

resultsAfter discharge from the documenting hospital, recurrent stroke occurred in 41 patients (5.6%) and recurrent TIA in 15 patients (2.1%). 52 patients (7.1%) had died, 33 (4.5%) from cardiovascular causes. Patients with an ESRS > or = 3 (vs <3) had a significantly higher risk of recurrent stroke or cardiovascular death (9.7% vs 5.1%; odds ratio (OR) 2.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08 to 3.70) and a higher recurrent stroke risk (6.9% vs 3.7%; OR 1.93, 95% CI 0.95 to 3.94). Patients with an ABI < or = 0.9 (vs > 0.9) had a significantly higher risk of recurrent stroke or cardiovascular death (10.4% vs 5.5%; OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.56) and a higher recurrent stroke risk (6.6% vs 4.6%; OR 1.47, 95% CI 0.76 to 2.83).

conclusionOur prospective follow-up study shows a significantly higher rate of recurrent stroke or cardiovascular death and a clear trend for a higher rate of recurrent stroke in patients with acute cerebrovascular events classified as high risk by an ESRS > or = 3 or a pathological ABI.

Indexed as

Ankle Brachial IndexSeverity of Illness IndexAgedCardiovascular DiseasesCerebrovascular DisordersFollow-Up StudiesGermanyHospitalsHumansPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesRecurrenceRiskStrokeTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID18586863
PMCPMC2775915
OpenAlexW2171840965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.