Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18586820›Full record

ReviewNucleic acids research2008

See me, feel me: methods to concurrently visualize and manipulate single DNA molecules and associated proteins.

Joost van Mameren, Erwin J G Peterman, Gijs J L Wuite

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nucleic acids research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Integrated In-Plane Nanofluidic Devices for Resistive-Pulse Sensing.Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) · 2024
    Review
  3. Optical Tweezers to Study Viruses.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Optical tweezers in single-molecule biophysics.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joost van MamerenDepartment of Physics and Astronomy and Laser Centre, VU University, De Boelelaan 1081, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Erwin J G Peterman
Gijs J L Wuite

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct visualization of DNA and proteins allows researchers to investigate DNA-protein interactions with great detail. Much progress has been made in this area as a result of increasingly sensitive single-molecule fluorescence techniques. At the same time, methods that control the conformation of DNA molecules have been improving constantly. The combination of both techniques has appealed to researchers ever since single-molecule measurements have become possible and indeed first implementations of such combined approaches have proven useful in the study of several DNA-binding proteins in real time. Here, we describe the technical state-of-the-art of various integrated manipulation-and-visualization methods. We first discuss methods that allow only little control over the DNA conformation, such as DNA combing. We then describe DNA flow-stretching approaches that allow more control, and end with the full control on position and extension obtained by manipulating DNA with optical tweezers. The advantages and limitations of the various techniques are discussed, as well as several examples of applications to biophysical or biochemical questions. We conclude with an outlook describing potential future technical developments in combining fluorescence microscopy with DNA micromanipulation technology.

Indexed as

Microscopy, FluorescenceDNADNA-Binding ProteinsGenetic TechniquesOptical TweezersDNADNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18586820
PMCPMC2490750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.