Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18586725›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2008

Identifying gene-disease associations using centrality on a literature mined gene-interaction network.

Arzucan Ozgür, Thuy Vu, Günes Erkan, Dragomir R Radev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 133 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
133citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

133 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Decoding the therapeutic potential mechanism ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

73 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arzucan OzgürElectrical Engineering and Computer Science and School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Thuy Vu
Günes Erkan
Dragomir R Radev

Funding

Nation Center- Integrative Biomedical Informatics(RMI)U54DA021519 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ATHEY, BRIAN DAVID · 2005 to 2010
$21.3M
Representing and Acquiring Knowledge of Genome RegulatioR01LM008106 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI STATES, DAVID J · 2003 to 2006
$1.3M
NIDA NIH HHS U54 DA021519NLM NIH HHS R01 LM008106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationUnderstanding the role of genetics in diseases is one of the most important aims of the biological sciences. The completion of the Human Genome Project has led to a rapid increase in the number of publications in this area. However, the coverage of curated databases that provide information manually extracted from the literature is limited. Another challenge is that determining disease-related genes requires laborious experiments. Therefore, predicting good candidate genes before experimental analysis will save time and effort. We introduce an automatic approach based on text mining and network analysis to predict gene-disease associations. We collected an initial set of known disease-related genes and built an interaction network by automatic literature mining based on dependency parsing and support vector machines. Our hypothesis is that the central genes in this disease-specific network are likely to be related to the disease. We used the degree, eigenvector, betweenness and closeness centrality metrics to rank the genes in the network.

resultsThe proposed approach can be used to extract known and to infer unknown gene-disease associations. We evaluated the approach for prostate cancer. Eigenvector and degree centrality achieved high accuracy. A total of 95% of the top 20 genes ranked by these methods are confirmed to be related to prostate cancer. On the other hand, betweenness and closeness centrality predicted more genes whose relation to the disease is currently unknown and are candidates for experimental study. AVAILABILITY: A web-based system for browsing the disease-specific gene-interaction networks is available at: http://gin.ncibi.org.

Indexed as

Database Management SystemsNatural Language ProcessingPeriodicals as TopicSignal TransductionGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansProtein Interaction MappingProteomeProteome

Identifiers

PMID18586725
PMCPMC2718658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.