ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2008
ProSOM: core promoter prediction based on unsupervised clustering of DNA physical profiles.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Novel Method for Predicting Oncogenic Types of Human Papillomavirus.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Characterization of archaeal promoters using explainable and web-based CNN model.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Physical Peculiarity of Two Sites in Human Promoters: Universality and Diverse Usage in Gene Function.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- From shallow to deep: some lessons learned from application of machine learning for recognition of functional genomic elements in human genome.Human genomics · 2022Review
- TSSFinder-fast and accurate ab initio prediction of the core promoter in eukaryotic genomes.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Article
- In silico analysis of promoter regions and regulatory elements (motifs and CpG islands) of the genes encoding for alcohol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiaea S288C and Schizosaccharomyces pombe 972h.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2021Article
- Article
- DeepGSR: an optimized deep-learning structure for the recognition of genomic signals and regions.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- Characterization of bovine (Bos taurus) imprinted genes from genomic to amino acid attributes by data mining approaches.PloS one · 2019Article
- 70ProPred: a predictor for discovering sigma70 promoters based on combining multiple features.BMC systems biology · 2018Article
- Evolution of Brain Active Gene Promoters in Human Lineage Towards the Increased Plasticity of Gene Regulation.Molecular neurobiology · 2018Article
- The impact of sequence length and number of sequences on promoter prediction performance.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- ElemeNT: a computational tool for detecting core promoter elements.Transcription · 2015Article
- iPro54-PseKNC: a sequence-based predictor for identifying sigma-54 promoters in prokaryote with pseudo k-tuple nucleotide composition.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- Effective suppression of dengue virus using a novel group-I intron that induces apoptotic cell death upon infection through conditional expression of the Bax C-terminal domain.Virology journal · 2014Article
- Structural properties of prokaryotic promoter regions correlate with functional features.PloS one · 2014Article
- Rule-based knowledge acquisition method for promoter prediction in human and Drosophila species.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2014Article
- Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement.PloS one · 2014Article
- A composite method based on formal grammar and DNA structural features in detecting human polymerase II promoter region.PloS one · 2013Article
- DNA-energetics-based analyses suggest additional genes in prokaryotes.Journal of biosciences · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationMore and more genomes are being sequenced, and to keep up with the pace of sequencing projects, automated annotation techniques are required. One of the most challenging problems in genome annotation is the identification of the core promoter. Because the identification of the transcription initiation region is such a challenging problem, it is not yet a common practice to integrate transcription start site prediction in genome annotation projects. Nevertheless, better core promoter prediction can improve genome annotation and can be used to guide experimental work.
resultsComparing the average structural profile based on base stacking energy of transcribed, promoter and intergenic sequences demonstrates that the core promoter has unique features that cannot be found in other sequences. We show that unsupervised clustering by using self-organizing maps can clearly distinguish between the structural profiles of promoter sequences and other genomic sequences. An implementation of this promoter prediction program, called ProSOM, is available and has been compared with the state-of-the-art. We propose an objective, accurate and biologically sound validation scheme for core promoter predictors. ProSOM performs at least as well as the software currently available, but our technique is more balanced in terms of the number of predicted sites and the number of false predictions, resulting in a better all-round performance. Additional tests on the ENCODE regions of the human genome show that 98% of all predictions made by ProSOM can be associated with transcriptionally active regions, which demonstrates the high precision. AVAILABILITY: Predictions for the human genome, the validation datasets and the program (ProSOM) are available upon request.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.