ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2008
Contact replacement for NMR resonance assignment.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reliable resonance assignments of selected residues of proteins with known structure based on empirical NMR chemical shift prediction.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2015Article
- HASH: a program to accurately predict protein Hα shifts from neighboring backbone shifts.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2013Article
- Combining automated peak tracking in SAR by NMR with structure-based backbone assignment from 15N-NOESY.BMC bioinformatics · 2012Article
- RDC derived protein backbone resonance assignment using fragment assembly.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2011Article
- Structure-oriented methods for protein NMR data analysis.Progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy · 2010Review
- SAGA: rapid automatic mainchain NMR assignment for large proteins.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2010Article
- Robust structure-based resonance assignment for functional protein studies by NMR.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2010Article
- Automated protein structure calculation from NMR data.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2009Article
- NOEnet--use of NOE networks for NMR resonance assignment of proteins with known 3D structure.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationComplementing its traditional role in structural studies of proteins, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is playing an increasingly important role in functional studies. NMR dynamics experiments characterize motions involved in target recognition, ligand binding, etc., while NMR chemical shift perturbation experiments identify and localize protein-protein and protein-ligand interactions. The key bottleneck in these studies is to determine the backbone resonance assignment, which allows spectral peaks to be mapped to specific atoms. This article develops a novel approach to address that bottleneck, exploiting an available X-ray structure or homology model to assign the entire backbone from a set of relatively fast and cheap NMR experiments.
resultsWe formulate contact replacement for resonance assignment as the problem of computing correspondences between a contact graph representing the structure and an NMR graph representing the data; the NMR graph is a significantly corrupted, ambiguous version of the contact graph. We first show that by combining connectivity and amino acid type information, and exploiting the random structure of the noise, one can provably determine unique correspondences in polynomial time with high probability, even in the presence of significant noise (a constant number of noisy edges per vertex). We then detail an efficient randomized algorithm and show that, over a variety of experimental and synthetic datasets, it is robust to typical levels of structural variation (1-2 AA), noise (250-600%) and missings (10-40%). Our algorithm achieves very good overall assignment accuracy, above 80% in alpha-helices, 70% in beta-sheets and 60% in loop regions. AVAILABILITY: Our contact replacement algorithm is implemented in platform-independent Python code. The software can be freely obtained for academic use by request from the authors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.