Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18586702›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2008

A model of higher accuracy for the individual haplotyping problem based on weighted SNP fragments and genotype with errors.

Minzhu Xie, Jianxin Wang, Jianer Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. dipSPAdes: Assembler for Highly Polymorphic Diploid Genomes.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2015
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Minzhu XieSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China.
Jianxin Wang
Jianer Chen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationIn genetic studies of complex diseases, haplotypes provide more information than genotypes. However, haplotyping is much more difficult than genotyping using biological techniques. Therefore effective computational techniques have been in demand. The individual haplotyping problem is the computational problem of inducing a pair of haplotypes from an individual's aligned SNP fragments. Based on various optimal criteria and including different extra information, many models for the problem have been proposed. Higher accuracy of the models has been an important issue in the study of haplotype reconstruction.

resultsThe current article proposes a highly accurate model for the single individual haplotyping problem based on weighted fragments and genotypes with errors. The model is proved to be NP-hard even with gapless fragments. Based on the characteristics of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) fragments, a parameterized algorithm of time complexity O(nk(2)2(k(2)) + m log m + mk(1)) is developed, where m is the number of fragments, n is the number of SNP sites, k(1) is the maximum number of SNP sites that a fragment covers (no more than n and usually smaller than 10) and k(2) is the maximum number of the fragments covering a SNP site (usually no more than 19). Extensive experiments show that this model is more accurate in haplotype reconstruction than other models. AVAILABILITY: The program of the parameterized algorithm can be obtained by sending an email to the corresponding author.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticBase SequenceChromosome MappingComputer SimulationGenetic LinkageGenotypeHaplotypesMolecular Sequence DataPolymorphism, Single NucleotideReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID18586702
PMCPMC2718625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.