ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2009
Systematic construction and prediction of the arrangement of the strands of sandwich proteins.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rules for connectivity of secondary structure elements in protein: Two-layer αβ sandwiches.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2017Article
- A method to predict edge strands in beta-sheets from protein sequences.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2013Article
- ASTRO-FOLD 2.0: an Enhanced Framework for Protein Structure Prediction.AIChE journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The problem of predicting the three-dimensional structure of a protein starting from its amino acid sequence is regarded as one of the most important open problems in biology. Here, we solve aspects of this problem for the so-called sandwich proteins that constitute a large class of proteins consisting of only beta-strands arranged in two sheets. A breakthrough for this class of proteins was announced in Kister et al. (Kister et al. 2002 Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 14 137-14 141), in which it was shown that sandwich proteins contain a certain invariant substructure called interlock. It was later noted that approximately 90% of the observed sandwich proteins are canonical, namely they are generated by certain geometrical structures. Here, employing a topological investigation, we prove that interlocks and geometrical structures are the direct consequence of certain biologically motivated fundamental principles. Furthermore, we construct all possible canonical motifs involving 6-10 strands. This construction limits dramatically the number of possible motifs. For example, for sandwich proteins with nine strands, the a priori number of possible canonical motifs exceeds 360000, whereas our construction yields only 49 geometrical structures and 625 canonical motifs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.