Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18586634›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2009

Systematic construction and prediction of the arrangement of the strands of sandwich proteins.

T S Papatheodorou, A S Fokas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Rules for connectivity of secondary structure elements in protein: Two-layer αβ sandwiches.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2017
    Article
  2. A method to predict edge strands in beta-sheets from protein sequences.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2013
    Article
  3. ASTRO-FOLD 2.0: an Enhanced Framework for Protein Structure Prediction.AIChE journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

T S PapatheodorouDepartment of Computer Engineering and Informatics, University of Patras, 265 04 Patras, Greece. tsp@hpclab.ceid.upatras.gr
A S Fokas

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The problem of predicting the three-dimensional structure of a protein starting from its amino acid sequence is regarded as one of the most important open problems in biology. Here, we solve aspects of this problem for the so-called sandwich proteins that constitute a large class of proteins consisting of only beta-strands arranged in two sheets. A breakthrough for this class of proteins was announced in Kister et al. (Kister et al. 2002 Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 14 137-14 141), in which it was shown that sandwich proteins contain a certain invariant substructure called interlock. It was later noted that approximately 90% of the observed sandwich proteins are canonical, namely they are generated by certain geometrical structures. Here, employing a topological investigation, we prove that interlocks and geometrical structures are the direct consequence of certain biologically motivated fundamental principles. Furthermore, we construct all possible canonical motifs involving 6-10 strands. This construction limits dramatically the number of possible motifs. For example, for sandwich proteins with nine strands, the a priori number of possible canonical motifs exceeds 360000, whereas our construction yields only 49 geometrical structures and 625 canonical motifs.

Indexed as

Amino Acid MotifsModels, MolecularProtein FoldingProtein Structure, SecondaryBiophysical PhenomenaProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID18586634
PMCPMC2610323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.