Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18586481›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2008

Visualizing and quantifying adhesive signals.

Mohsen Sabouri-Ghomi, Yi Wu, Klaus Hahn, Gaudenz Danuser

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Single-cell imaging of mechanotransduction in endothelial cells.Progress in molecular biology and translational science · 2014
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. The shape of motile cells.Current biology : CB · 2009
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Signaling pathways that control cell migration: models and analysis.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohsen Sabouri-GhomiDepartment of Cell Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Yi Wu
Klaus Hahn
Gaudenz Danuser

Funding

STRUCTUREU54GM064346 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI IMPERIALI, BARBARA · 2001 to 2010
$74.9M
Systems Biology of Cell Decision ProcessesP50GM068762 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI YAFFE, MICHAEL B · 2003 to 2012
$32.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM068762NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM68762NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM064346NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM64346
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the structural adaptation and signaling of adhesion sites in response to mechanical stimuli requires in situ characterization of the dynamic activation of a large number of adhesion components. Here, we review high-resolution live cell imaging approaches to measure forces, assembly, and interaction of adhesion components, and the activation of adhesion-mediated signals. We conclude by outlining computational multiplexing as a framework for the integration of these data into comprehensive models of adhesion signaling pathways.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesAnimalsCell AdhesionCell Adhesion MoleculesCytoskeletonExtracellular MatrixMechanotransduction, CellularMicroscopy, FluorescenceSpectrum AnalysisStress, MechanicalCell Adhesion Molecules

Identifiers

PMID18586481
PMCPMC2661108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.