Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18585359›Full record

ArticleCell2008

Variation in homeodomain DNA binding revealed by high-resolution analysis of sequence preferences.

Michael F Berger, Gwenael Badis, Andrew R Gehrke, Shaheynoor Talukder, Anthony A Philippakis, Lourdes Peña-Castillo, Trevis M Alleyne, Sanie Mnaimneh, Olga B Botvinnik, Esther T Chan and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 413 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
413citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

413 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. TF paralogs-Natural experiments in DNA binding.Current opinion in structural biology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

353 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Michael F BergerDivision of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Gwenael Badis
Andrew R Gehrke
Shaheynoor Talukder
Anthony A Philippakis
Lourdes Peña-Castillo
Trevis M Alleyne
Sanie Mnaimneh
Olga B Botvinnik
Esther T Chan
Faiqua Khalid
Wen Zhang
Daniel Newburger
Savina A Jaeger
Quaid D Morris
Martha L Bulyk
Timothy R Hughes

Funding

Universal, Compact Combinatorial Microarrays for DNA Binding Site DiscoveryR01HG003985 · NHGRI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BULYK, MARTHA L · 2006 to 2017
$4.9M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG003985
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most homeodomains are unique within a genome, yet many are highly conserved across vast evolutionary distances, implying strong selection on their precise DNA-binding specificities. We determined the binding preferences of the majority (168) of mouse homeodomains to all possible 8-base sequences, revealing rich and complex patterns of sequence specificity and showing that there are at least 65 distinct homeodomain DNA-binding activities. We developed a computational system that successfully predicts binding sites for homeodomain proteins as distant from mouse as Drosophila and C. elegans, and we infer full 8-mer binding profiles for the majority of known animal homeodomains. Our results provide an unprecedented level of resolution in the analysis of this simple domain structure and suggest that variation in sequence recognition may be a factor in its functional diversity and evolutionary success.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceComputational BiologyConserved SequenceDNAEvolution, MolecularHomeodomain ProteinsMiceModels, MolecularProtein BindingTranscription FactorsDNAHomeodomain ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID18585359
PMCPMC2531161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.