Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18585102›Full record

ArticleDNA repair2008

A comparison of BRCT domains involved in nonhomologous end-joining: introducing the solution structure of the BRCT domain of polymerase lambda.

Geoffrey A Mueller, Andrea F Moon, Eugene F Derose, Jody M Havener, Dale A Ramsden, Lars C Pedersen, Robert E London

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in DNA repair, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. NCell research · 2021
    Article
  12. Structure and function relationships in mammalian DNA polymerases.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Geoffrey A MuellerLaboratory of Structural Biology, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, MD MR-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA. mueller3@niehs.nih.gov <mueller3@niehs.nih.gov>
Andrea F Moon
Eugene F Derose
Jody M Havener
Dale A Ramsden
Lars C Pedersen
Robert E London
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Nmr Studies Of Biomolecular Structure, Function, And DynamicsZIAES050111 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LONDON, ROBERT E · 2009 to 2020
$11.7M
Aids Related Nmr ResearchZIAES050147 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LONDON, ROBERT E · 2009 to 2020
$6.3M
The Role of DNA Synthesis in Nonhomologous End JoiningR01CA097096 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DALE A RAMSDEN · 2003 to 2026
$5.5M
Resolution of Complex Breaks by Nonhomologous End JoiningR01CA084442 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI RAMSDEN, DALE A · 2000 to 2019
$4.8M
DNA Polymerases in Nonhomologous End JoiningU01CA097096 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI RAMSDEN, DALE A · 2019 to 2022
$1.4M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 ES999999NCI NIH HHS CA 97096NCI NIH HHS R01 CA084442NCI NIH HHS R01 CA097096NCI NIH HHS U01 CA097096PHS HHS HHS27300700046U
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three of the four family X polymerases, DNA polymerase lambda, DNA polymerase mu, and TdT, have been associated with repair of double-strand DNA breaks by nonhomologous end-joining. Their involvement in this DNA repair process requires an N-terminal BRCT domain that mediates interaction with other protein factors required for recognition and binding of broken DNA ends. Here we present the NMR solution structure of the BRCT domain of DNA polymerase lambda, completing the structural portrait for this family of enzymes. Analysis of the overall fold of the polymerase lambda BRCT domain reveals structural similarity to the BRCT domains of polymerase mu and TdT, yet highlights some key sequence and structural differences that may account for important differences in the biological activities of these enzymes and their roles in nonhomologous end-joining. Mutagenesis studies indicate that the conserved Arg57 residue of Pol lambda plays a more critical role for binding to the XRCC4-Ligase IV complex than its structural homolog in Pol mu, Arg43. In contrast, the hydrophobic Leu60 residue of Pol lambda contributes less significantly to binding than the structurally homologous Phe46 residue of Pol mu. A third leucine residue involved in the binding and activity of Pol mu, is nonconservatively replaced by a glutamine in Pol lambda (Gln64) and, based on binding and activity data, is apparently unimportant for Pol lambda interactions with the NHEJ complex. In conclusion, both the structure of the Pol lambda BRCT domain and its mode of interaction with the other components of the NHEJ complex significantly differ from the two previously studied homologs, Pol mu and TdT.

Indexed as

Recombination, GeneticAmino Acid SequenceBase SequenceDNA Polymerase betaDNA PrimersElectrophoretic Mobility Shift AssayModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularProtein BindingProtein ConformationSequence Homology, Amino AcidDNA Polymerase betaDNA polymerase beta2DNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID18585102
PMCPMC2583787
OpenAlexW2019571003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.