Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18584334›Full record

ArticleThe AAPS journal2008

Slow release formulations of inhaled rifampin.

Intira Coowanitwong, Vikram Arya, Poj Kulvanich, Günther Hochhaus

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The AAPS journal, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Intira CoowanitwongDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 32610, USA.
Vikram Arya
Poj Kulvanich
Günther Hochhaus
University of Florida · USChulalongkorn University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rifampin microspheres were prepared by spray drying using either polylactic acid (PLA) or poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) polymers in different drug to polymer ratios (90:10 to 5:95, w/w). The in-vitro release characteristics, particle-size distribution, and cytotoxicity (in an alveolar macrophage cell line) and pharmacokinetics in rats after pulmonary instillation were evaluated. Increasing the polymer content from 10% to 95% slowed down the in vitro drug release with PLGA particles showing a steeper change with increasing polymer content (100% to 20% drug release over 6 h) than PLA particles (88% to 42% drug release over 6 h). PLA microsphere formulations revealed lack of cytotoxicity and a mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMDA) of 2.22-2.86 mum, while PLGA particles were larger (MMDA of 4.67-5.11 mum). Pharmacokinetics differed among the formulations with the 10% PLA formulation showing a distinct sustained release (t (max) of 2 h vs 0.5 h of free drug) and a systemic bioavailability similar to that of free drug. Formulations with high polymer content showed a lower relative bioavailability (30%). This suggested that an optimal release rate existed for which a distinct amount of drug was delivered over an extended period of time.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAnimalsAntibiotics, AntitubercularCell LineCell SurvivalDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug CarriersDrug CompoundingMacrophages, AlveolarMaleMiceMicrospheresParticle SizeRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRifampinAntibiotics, AntitubercularDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug CarriersRifampin

Identifiers

PMID18584334
PMCPMC2751394
OpenAlexW1981150315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.