Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18584194›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2009

Prevalence of adverse drug combinations in a large post-mortem toxicology database.

Terhi Launiainen, Erkki Vuori, Ilkka Ojanperä

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Terhi LauniainenDepartment of Forensic Medicine, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 40, 00014, Helsinki, Finland. terhi.launiainen@helsinki.fi
Erkki Vuori
Ilkka Ojanperä
University of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of important adverse drug combinations was studied among the 37,367 cases included in the Finnish post-mortem toxicology database during 2000-2006. The new SFINX interaction database (Swedish, Finnish, INteraction X-referencing) was utilised to identify adverse drug combinations. Consequently, the 24 drugs chosen for the study generated 96 two-compound combinations possessing potentially severe interactions. The total number of hits for the combinations found in the post-mortem database was 267, which accounts for approximately 0.71% of all cases. The potential role of adverse drug interaction (ADI) in these cases was evaluated from the background information and death certificate. The possible ADI cases comprised 23% of all hits and 0.17% of all cases analysed. In cases with a pharmacodynamic mechanism, the most prominent combinations were medicines causing serotonin syndrome or a beta(1)-blocker with verapamil or diltiazem. In cases with a pharmacokinetic mechanism, half of the cases involved digoxin in combination with verapamil. In one third of the possible ADI cases, a forensic pathologist had noted the studied compounds as an underlying or contributing cause of death, although the agents' specific role in ADIs was rarely recognised.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDrug InteractionsCause of DeathDatabases, FactualFemaleFinlandForensic ToxicologyHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID18584194
OpenAlexW2075543505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.