ArticleDer Unfallchirurg2008
[Early interdisciplinary geriatric rehabilitation after hip fracture : Effective concept or just transfer of costs?].
Article in Der Unfallchirurg, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Patients with periprosthetic femur fractures and consecutive stem replacement. Analysis of survival, complications, and quality of life].Der Unfallchirurg · 2013Trial
- Management of pertrochanteric fractures in patients over 90 years: In-hospital mortality rate, complications and associated risk factors.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021Article
- Cost-effectiveness of group-based exercise to prevent falls in elderly community-dwelling people.BMC geriatrics · 2021Article
- [Hybrid stabilization and geriatric complex treatment of type A spinal fractures].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2020Article
- Article
- [Elderly trauma patients with proximal femur fractures : Statistical evaluation of regular process data from a trauma center for the elderly].Der Unfallchirurg · 2017Article
- [Geriatric complex treatment of proximal femoral fractures? Who profits the most?].Der Unfallchirurg · 2015Article
- COMORBIDITY IMPACT ON SOCIAL FUNCTIONING AFTER HIP FRACTURE: THE ROLE OF REHABILITATION.Acta ortopedica brasileiraArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundModern strategies for postoperative care of patients with hip fractures include early discharge from the acute care hospital to inpatient interdisciplinary rehabilitation facilities. Whether these programs are effective for the patients and improve their long-term outcomes or if they simply transfer costs, with a reduction of the inpatient days in the acute care hospital, is currently under discussion. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis prospective study included 282 patients with hip fracture admitted to our trauma center were included into the prospective study. The mean patient age was 86+/-8 (65-110) years. All patients were treated operatively. After a mean of 12+/-9 days, the patients underwent inpatient interdisciplinary geriatric rehabilitation for a mean of 27+/-13 (4-103) days. The primary outcome measure was their activities of daily living (Barthel index) before, at the end of rehabilitation, and 1 year after trauma. In addition, patient-related variables were correlated with the Barthel index.
resultsWith discharge from the acute care hospital, the Barthel index was 42+/-20 points and it increased during rehabilitation to 65+/-26 points. One year later the Barthel index was 67+/-28 points. Ninety percent of patients improved their Barthel index during rehabilitation. Within 1 year, 40% of patients deteriorated in their activities of daily living. Fifty one percent of patients were reintegrated back to their homes. Patients who lived at home before trauma and were reintegrated back to their homes had a significant higher Barthel index (75+/-24) 1 year after trauma than patients who were living in a nursing care facility before the trauma (Barthel index 52+/-27). The variables of age, level of cognition, and type of fracture had no influence on the long-term outcome. An extension of rehabilitation above the mean time period did not improve the sustainable clinical outcome.
conclusionPostoperative inpatient rehabilitation programs enhance short-term activities of daily living. In particular, patients who lived at home before the trauma and were reintegrated back home benefited in perpetuity from geriatric rehabilitation. A policy for early discharge to geriatric rehabilitation is associated with extension of overall hospital stay. This association along with the related increased health care costs should be weighed against the sociofunctional effectiveness of these programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18584140What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.