ArticlePLoS computational biology2008
Ten simple rules for organizing a scientific meeting.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scientific Meetings in Medical Oncology: Are We Facing a Time- and Resource-Consuming Plethora?Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Ten simple rules for pushing boundaries of inclusion at academic events.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Ten simple rules for writing a PLOS Computational Biology quick tips article.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Ten simple rules for organizing a special session at a scientific conference.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- A community-university run conference as a catalyst for addressing health disparities in an urban community.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2022Article
- Postgraduate radiology education: what has Covid-19 changed?BJR open · 2021Article
- Ten simple rules to run a successful BioHackathon.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Ten Simple Rules for organizing a non-real-time web conference.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Closing the gender gap at academic conferences: A tool for monitoring and assessing academic events.PloS one · 2020Article
- Ten simple rules for organizing a webinar series.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Reflections on a journey: a retrospective of the ISCB Student Council symposium series.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Ten simple rules for measuring the impact of workshops.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Ten simple rules for forming a scientific professional society.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
- Ten Simple Rules on How to Organize a Scientific Retreat.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
- Ten Simple Rules for Curating and Facilitating Small Workshops.PLoS computational biology · 2016Article
- Ten simple rules for a community computational challenge.PLoS computational biology · 2015Article
- Ten simple rules for organizing an unconference.PLoS computational biology · 2015Article
- The young PI buzz: learning from the organizers of the Junior Principal Investigator Meeting at ISMB-ECCB 2013.PLoS computational biology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.