Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18582409›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2008

The Framingham study and treatment guidelines for stroke prevention.

Enzo Grossi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Enzo GrossiCentro Diagnostico Italiano, Via Saint Bon 20, 20147 Milan, Italy. enzo.grossi@bracco.com
Centro Diagnostico Italiano · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, institutional bodies and scientific societies of principal Western countries have produced several guidelines dealing with risk assessment, primary prevention, and treatment of acute stroke. From a prospective, community-based, observational cohort of patients from the Framingham Heart Study, an absolute estimate of risk for stroke alone or stroke or death was determined based on several risk factors, including advanced age, female sex, increased systolic blood pressure, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack, and diabetes mellitus. This algorithm considers many variables and expresses their results as the percentage of risk of developing a fatal or nonfatal stroke in the following 5 years. The author has identified three major pitfalls of this algorithm, which are related to the limitation of the classic statistical approach in handling this kind of nonlinear and complex information: 1) the very large confidence interval of individual risk assessment, 2) the inability to capture the process dynamics, and 3) the inability to capture the disease complexity. The artificial intelligence armamentarium may provide an advantage in the attempt to overcome these limitations. The theoretic background and some application examples related to artificial neural networks (ANNs) and fuzzy logic are reviewed and discussed. Newer approaches linked to artificial intelligence, such as fuzzy logic and ANNs, seem better at addressing the challenge of the increasing complexity of the predisposing factors linked to cerebrovascular events and at predicting future events in an individual patient.

Identifiers

PMID18582409
OpenAlexW2033071619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.