ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2008
Influence of DNA structure on adjacent site cooperative binding.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- DNA suspension arrays: silencing discrete artifacts for high-sensitivity applications.PloS one · 2010Article
- Minor groove binding compounds that jump a gc base pair and bind to adjacent AT base pair sites.Biochemistry · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previous NMR studies of Hoechst 33258 with the d(CTTTTGCAAAAG)2 sequence have shown very strong (K2 >> K1) cooperativity between two adjacent binding sites (Searle, M. S.; Embrey, K. J. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990, 18 (13), 3753- 3762). In contrast, surface plasmon resonance (SPR) results with the hairpin analog of the same sequence show significantly reduced cooperativity. In an effort to explain the difference, two-dimensional (2-D) NMR experiments were done on both duplex and hairpin. Hoechst 33258 and an amidine analog, DB183, show very strong cooperativity with the duplex DNA but much weaker cooperativity with the hairpin. The significantly lower thermal melting temperature (Tm) of the duplex (34.8 degrees C) in comparison to its hairpin analog (62.3 degrees C) supports the idea of a dynamic difference between the two DNA structures that can influence cooperativity in binding. These results confirm the role of conformational entropy in positive cooperativity in some DNA interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.