Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18581825›Full record

ArticleHealth care management science2008

Waiting for liver transplantation in Canada: waitlist history 2000--2004 and sensitivity analysis for the future.

David A Stanford, Elizabeth M Renouf, Vivian C McAlister

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Health care management science, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David A StanfordDepartment of Statistical and Actuarial Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada. stanford@stats.uwo.ca
Elizabeth M Renouf
Vivian C McAlister

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study comprises a historical review of liver transplants performed in Canada during 2000--2004, and sensitivity analyses to assess the impact of possible changes in the operation of the waitlists. In the first part, overall statistics are reported, and the notable impact that blood type plays in affecting waiting time is discussed. Waiting times and numbers of transplants are also reported by gender, age, and geographic region (waitlist), and statistical analyses of the patient placement and cadaveric donations processes are performed. These analyses establish that the service times of an appropriate queuing model are closely approximated by an exponential distribution. Consequently, the resulting distribution for the waiting time from placement until transplant is well described by a different exponential distribution. The GI/M/1 queuing model is then used to perform a number of sensitivity analyses. The sensitivity analyses attempt to quantify the impact of no change in policy via a lottery system, and likely increases in cadaveric and/or living donor sources that would be needed to bring stability to the system. The results can be used by relevant authorities, together with information on success rates for publicity campaigns and living donor matching campaigns, to assess where further efforts should be made to reduce waiting times.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalWaiting ListsAge DistributionBlood Grouping and CrossmatchingCanadaHealth Services ResearchHealth StatusHumansLiver TransplantationLiving DonorsSex Distribution

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.