Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18581594›Full record

ArticleYonsei medical journal2008

Does quantitative tibial ultrasound predict low bone mineral density defined by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry?

Hakan Tuna, Murat Birtane, Galip Ekuklu, Fikret Cermik, Filiz Tuna, Siranus Kokino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Yonsei medical journal, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Which Method is More Efficient in Determining Osteoporosis, QUS or DEXA?International journal of endocrinology and metabolism · 2012
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Bone mineral density changes in patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis.Clinical medicine insights. Arthritis and musculoskeletal disorders · 2011
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hakan TunaDepartments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Trakya University Hospital, Edirne, Turkey. hakantuna@trakya.edu.tr
Murat Birtane
Galip Ekuklu
Fikret Cermik
Filiz Tuna
Siranus Kokino

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEfforts for the early detection of bone loss and subsequent fracture risk by quantitative ultrasound (QUS), which is a non-invasive, radiation free, and cheaper method, seem rational to reduce the management costs. We aimed in this study to assess the probable correlation of speed of sound (SOS) values obtained by QUS with bone mineral density (BMD) as measured by the gold standard method, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), and to investigate the diagnostic value of QUS to define low BMD. MATERIALS AND

methodsOne hundred twenty-two postmenopausal women having prior standard DEXA measurements were included in the study. Spine and proximal femur (neck, trochanter and Ward's triangle) BMD were assessed in a standard protocol by DEXA. The middle point of the right tibia was chosen for SOS measurement by tibial QUS.

resultsThe SOS values were observed to be significantly higher in the normal BMD (t score > -1) group at all measurement sites except for the lumbar region, when compared with the low BMD group (t score < -1). SOS was negatively correlated with age (r= -0.66) and month since menopause (r= -0.57). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for QUS t score to diagnose low BMD did not seem to be satisfactory at either of the measurement sites.

conclusionTibial SOS was correlated weakly with BMD values of femur and lumbar spine as measured by DEXA and its diagnostic value did not seem to be high for discriminating between normal and low BMD, at these sites.

Indexed as

Bone DensityAbsorptiometry, PhotonAgedFemaleFemurHumansMiddle AgedOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySpineTibiaUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID18581594
PMCPMC2615346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.