Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18579319›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2008

Generalizability of clinical trials for alcohol dependence to community samples.

Carlos Blanco, Mark Olfson, Mayumi Okuda, Edward V Nunes, Shang-Min Liu, Deborah S Hasin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Clinicians' Perceptions of Rapid Scale-up of Telehealth Services in Outpatient Mental Health Treatment.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carlos BlancoNew York State Psychiatric Institute/Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, 1051 Riverside Drive, Box 69, New York, NY 10032, United States. cb255@columbia.edu
Mark Olfson
Mayumi Okuda
Edward V Nunes
Shang-Min Liu
Deborah S Hasin

Funding

RESEARCH COREP60MD000206 · NIMHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LUCHSINGER, JOSE ALEJANDRO · 2003 to 2012
$16.2M
ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE: GENERAL POPULATION VALIDITYR01AA008159 · NIAAA · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE · PI HASIN, DEBORAH S. · 1990 to 2003
$2.7M
Towards a Comprehensive Developmental Model of Substance Use DisordersR01DA019606 · NIDA · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI OLFSON, MARK · 2006 to 2016
$2.6M
SMART: Improving Detection & Outcome of Psychiatric Comorbidity in Drug TreatmentR01DA020783 · NIDA · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI BLANCO, CARLOS · 2006 to 2010
$1.4M
Bridging Efficacy and Effectiveness in Drug Abuse TreatmentK02DA023200 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BLANCO, CARLOS · 2008 to 2012
$618k
EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES OF ALCOHOL USE DISORDERSK02AA000161 · NIAAA · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI HASIN, DEBORAH S. · 1993 to 2002
$312k
NIAAA NIH HHS K02 AA000161NIAAA NIH HHS K05AA00161NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA008159NIAAA NIH HHS R01AA08159NIDA NIH HHS DA019606NIDA NIH HHS DA020783NIDA NIH HHS DA023200NIDA NIH HHS K02 DA023200NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA019606NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA020783NIMHD NIH HHS P60 MD000206
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing concern that results of tightly controlled clinical trials of individuals with alcohol use disorders may not generalize to broader community samples. To assess the proportion of community-dwelling adults with alcohol dependence who would have been eligible for a typical alcohol dependence treatment study, we developed a new, simple method: we applied a standard set of eligibility criteria commonly used in alcohol outcome studies to a large (n=43,093) representative US adult sample interviewed face-to-face, the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC). We found that approximately one-half (50.5%) of all individuals with a DSM-IV diagnosis of alcohol dependence (n=1484) and 79.4% of those who sought treatment (n=185) were excluded by one or more study criteria. Individual study criteria excluded from 0.9% to 48.2% of the overall sample and 0.8% to 43.7% of the treatment-seeking sample. For the overall sample, the lack of motivation/compliance and financial situation criteria excluded the largest percentage of individuals. In the treatment-seeking subsample, comorbid medical conditions and legal problems excluded the largest proportions of individuals. Our study provides a new method to assess the generalizability of clinical trials, and gives further evidence that typical clinical trials for alcohol dependence likely exclude most adults with the disorder in the community and under care, and support the notion that clinical trials recruit "pure" rather than "typical" patients. Clinical trials should carefully evaluate the effects of the selected eligibility criteria on the generalizability of their results.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionAdultAlcoholismClinical Trials as TopicComorbidityData CollectionFemaleHumansMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CareSelection BiasUnited States

Identifiers

PMID18579319
PMCPMC3755733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.