Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18579314›Full record

ReviewCancer treatment reviews2008

Bone markers and their prognostic value in metastatic bone disease: clinical evidence and future directions.

Robert Coleman, Janet Brown, Evangelos Terpos, Allan Lipton, Matthew R Smith, Richard Cook, Pierre Major

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer treatment reviews, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Denosumab versus bisphosphonates in patients with advanced cancers-related bone metastasis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. SEOM guidelines for the treatment of bone metastases from solid tumours.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2012
    Guideline
  5. [Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Impact ofNutrients · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Combinatorial effect of radium-223 and irreversible electroporation on prostate cancer bone metastasis in mice.International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Robert ColemanAcademic Unit of Clinical Oncology, Cancer Research Centre, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield S10 2SJ, UK. R.E.Coleman@sheffield.ac.uk
Janet Brown
Evangelos Terpos
Allan Lipton
Matthew R Smith
Richard Cook
Pierre Major
Cancer Research UK · GBHellenic Air Force · GRMassachusetts General Hospital · USMcMaster University · CAPenn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · USUniversity of Waterloo · CAWeston Park Cancer Centre · GB

Funding

Midcareer Investigator AwardK24CA121990 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SMITH, MATTHEW RAYMOND · 2007 to 2016
$1.9M
Cancer Research UK 10048NCI NIH HHS K24 CA121990
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBone metastases are prevalent among patients with advanced solid tumors. Metastatic bone disease alters bone homeostasis, resulting in reduced bone integrity and, consequently, increased skeletal complications. Biochemical markers of bone metabolism may meet an unmet need for useful, noninvasive, and sensitive surrogate information for following patients' skeletal health. MATERIALS AND

methodsData for this review were identified by searches of PubMed, and references from relevant articles using the search terms "bone markers" or individual bone marker nomenclature, "cancer," and "metastases." Abstracts and reports from meetings were included only when they related directly to previously published work. Only papers published in English between 1990 and 2007 were included.

resultsRecent retrospective analyses with bisphosphonates, and particularly with zoledronic acid, have shown significant correlations between biochemical markers of bone metabolism levels and clinical outcomes, especially for bone resorption markers. Clinical results for biochemical markers of bone formation and resorption and other emerging markers of bone metabolism including bone sialoprotein, receptor-activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand, osteoprotegerin, and other markers are presented. However, biochemical markers of bone metabolism are not yet an established surrogate endpoint for treatment efficacy.

conclusionsBiochemical markers of bone metabolism may allow physicians to identify which patients with metastatic bone disease are at high risk for skeletal-related events or death and who may be responding to therapy. Prospective randomized clinical trials are underway to further assess the utility of markers of bone metabolism in patients with bone metastases.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAlkaline PhosphataseBiomarkers, TumorBone DensityBone NeoplasmsBone RemodelingBone ResorptionDisease ProgressionEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOsteocalcinAlkaline PhosphataseBiomarkers, TumorOsteocalcinOsteoprotegerinProcollagenSialoglycoproteins

Identifiers

PMID18579314
PMCPMC3090688
OpenAlexW1998765212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.