ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2008
Male-biased genes are overrepresented among novel Drosophila pseudoobscura sex-biased genes.
Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Chromosomal Distribution of Sex-Biased MicroRNAs in Drosophila is Nonadaptive.Genome biology and evolution · 2022Article
- The Goddard and Saturn Genes Are Essential for Drosophila Male Fertility and May Have Arisen De Novo.Molecular biology and evolution · 2017Article
- Genes from scratch--the evolutionary fate of de novo genes.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2015Review
- Sex-biased expression of microRNAs in Drosophila melanogaster.Open biology · 2014Article
- The life cycle of Drosophila orphan genes.eLife · 2014Article
- Non-random genomic integration - an intrinsic property of retrogenes in Drosophila?BMC evolutionary biology · 2010Article
- Gene content evolution on the X chromosome.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe origin of functional innovation is among the key questions in biology. Recently, it has been shown that new genes could arise from non-coding DNA and that such novel genes are often involved in male reproduction.
resultsWith the aim of identifying novel genes, we used the technique "generation of longer cDNA fragments from serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE) tags for gene identification (GLGI)" to extend 84 sex-biased 3'end SAGE tags that previously could not be mapped to the D. pseudoobscura transcriptome. Eleven male-biased and 33 female-biased GLGI fragments were obtained, of which 5 male-biased and 3 female-biased tags corresponded to putatively novel genes. This excess of novel genes with a male-biased gene expression pattern is consistent with previous results, which found novel genes to be primarily expressed in male reproductive tissues. 5' RACE analysis indicated that these novel transcripts are very short in length and could contain introns. Interspecies comparisons revealed that most novel transcripts show evidence for purifying selection.
conclusionOverall, our data indicate that among sex-biased genes a considerable number of novel genes (approximately 2-4%) exist in D. pseudoobscura, which could not be predicted based on D. melanogaster gene models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.