Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18577028›Full record

ReviewClinical and experimental immunology2008

Clinical immunology review series: an approach to the use of the immunology laboratory in the diagnosis of clinical allergy.

P Williams, W A C Sewell, C Bunn, R Pumphrey, G Read, S Jolles

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and experimental immunology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Total IgE as a Marker for Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. An approach to the patient with urticaria.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2008
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

P WilliamsDepartment of Biochemistry and Immunology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK. paule.williams@cardiffandvale.wales.nhs.uk
W A C Sewell
C Bunn
R Pumphrey
G Read
S Jolles
University Hospital of Wales · GBScunthorpe General Hospital · GBSt Mary's Hospital · GBThe Royal Free Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last 10 years UK immunology laboratories have seen a dramatic increase in the number and range of allergy tests performed. The reasons for this have been an increase in the incidence of immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated allergic disease set against a background of greater public awareness and more referrals for assessment. Laboratory testing forms an integral part of a comprehensive allergy service and physicians treating patients with allergic disease need to have an up-to-date knowledge of the range of tests available, their performance parameters and interpretation as well as the accreditation status of the laboratory to which tests are being sent. The aim of this review is to describe the role of the immunology laboratory in the assessment of patients with IgE-mediated allergic disease and provide an up-to-date summary of the tests currently available, their sensitivity, specificity, interpretation and areas of future development.

Indexed as

AllergensHumansHypersensitivityImmunoglobulin EImmunologic TestsLaboratoriesAllergensImmunoglobulin E

Identifiers

PMID18577028
PMCPMC2432092
OpenAlexW2036555946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.