ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2008
What's new in haemolytic uraemic syndrome?
Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Encapsulation of Biological Agents in Hydrogels for Therapeutic Applications.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Review
- Advances and challenges in the management of complement-mediated thrombotic microangiopathies.Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2015Review
- Rapid recovery of membrane cofactor protein (MCP; CD46) associated atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome with plasma exchange.BMJ case reports · 2013Article
- Assesment, treatment and prevention of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome.International journal of preventive medicine · 2013Article
- Eculizumab therapy in a child with hemolytic uremic syndrome and CFI mutation.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2012Article
- Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2011Review
- Allelic variants of complement genes associated with dense deposit disease.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advances in understanding the aetiology of the disorders that make up the haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS) permit a revised classification of the syndrome. With appropriate laboratory support, an aetiologically-based subgroup diagnosis can be made in all but a few cases. HUS caused by enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli remains by far the most prevalent subgroup, and new insights into this zoonosis are discussed. The most rapidly expanding area of interest is the subgroup of inherited and acquired abnormalities of complement regulation. Details of the pathogenesis are incomplete but it is reasonable to conclude that local activation of the alternative pathway of complement in the glomerulus is a central event. There is no evidence-based treatment for this diagnostic subgroup. However, in circumstances where there is a mutated plasma factor such as complement factor H, strategies to replace the abnormal protein by plasmapheresis or more radically by liver transplantation are logical, and anecdotal successes are reported. In summary, the clinical presentation of HUS gives a strong indication as to the underlying cause. Patients without evidence of EHEC infection should be fully investigated to determine the aetiology. Where complement abnormalities are suspected there is a strong argument for empirical and early plasma exchange, although rapid advances in this field may provide more specific treatments in the near future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.