Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18574734›Full record

ReviewStem cell reviews2008

Tiers of clonal organization in the epidermis: the epidermal proliferation unit revisited.

Lauren R Strachan, Ruby Ghadially

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell reviews, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren R StrachanDepartment of Dermatology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Ruby Ghadially
San Francisco VA Medical Center · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

UCSF Dermatology Training GrantT32AR007175 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Wilson Liao, Michael David Rosenblum · 1986 to 2026
$6.1M
Characterization of Epidermal Stem CellsR01AR053765 · NIAMS · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI GHADIALLY, RUBY · 2005 to 2009
$1.7M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR053765NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR007175-30
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As one of the most proliferative tissues in adult mammals, the epidermis is a good example of the precise regulation necessary between stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. The epidermis is derived from ectodermal progenitor cells and contains three distinct classes of cells: epidermal stem cells which are capable of infinite rounds of cell division; their immediate descendants, transient amplifying cells, which are capable of numerous but finite rounds of cell division; and finally, non-dividing, differentiating cells (Aberdam in Cell and Tissue Research 331:103-107, 2008). This proliferative hierarchy must be tightly regulated both temporally and spatially during epidermal development and homeostasis in order to prevent uncontrolled growth leading to hyperproliferative states and/or tumorigenesis. Historically, the most basic unit of epidermal proliferation has been described as the epidermal proliferation unit (EPU). The EPU, as originally characterized by Christophers, Potten and Mackenzie, is a proliferation unit consisting of approximately 10 basal cells with a clonogenic cell in the center and overlaid by the suprabasal and corneocyte progeny (reviewed in Potten, C. S. (1974). The epidermal proliferative unit: the possible role of the central basal cell. Cell and Tissue Kinetics, 7(1), 77-88). Numerous researchers have identified this classical EPU structure, consisting of approximately 20 cells, in a variety of mammalian skin sources. Recently however, lineage analyses have provided evidence for much larger clonal epidermal units consisting of hundreds to thousands of cells. Furthermore, cutaneous mosaicism as well as a variety of cutaneous pathologies indicate that clonal areas extend to whole patches of mammalian skin many centimeters across. In this review we revisit four decades of experimental evidence and put forward a model of clonal units derived from multiple classes of epidermal progenitors ranging from the largest and most primitive units, clonal ectodermal units, to epidermal stem cell units, and finally, to the most basic structural unit, the EPU.

Indexed as

Cell ProliferationEpidermal CellsAnimalsCell DifferentiationHumansMiceModels, BiologicalStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID18574734
OpenAlexW2027986625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.