Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18573901›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2008

Diverse myeloid and lymphoid cell subpopulations produce gamma interferon during early innate immune responses to Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain.

Roberto De Pascalis, Betsy C Taylor, Karen L Elkins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. mBio · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Host Immunity andMicroorganisms · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Infection and immunity · 2018
    Article
  8. Vaccine-Mediated Mechanisms Controlling Replication ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Conventional CD4Nature communications · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. AnFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Subversion of host recognition and defense systems by Francisella spp.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2012
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Roberto De PascalisLaboratory of Mycobacterial Diseases and Cellular Immunology, Center for Biologics Research and Evaluation, US FDA, 1401 Rockville Pike, HFM 431, Rockville, Maryland 20852, USA. roberto.depascalis@fda.hhs.gov
Betsy C Taylor
Karen L Elkins

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Francisella tularensis, a small gram-negative intracellular bacterium responsible for causing tularemia, is highly pathogenic and classified as a category A agent of bioterrorism. As for other intracellular pathogens, successful protective immune responses to Francisella tularensis require rapid and efficient induction of gamma interferon (IFN-gamma) production. Studies using intracellular bacteria such as Listeria monocytogenes as well as Francisella suggest that natural killer (NK) and T cells are important sources of IFN-gamma. However, comprehensive characterization of specific sources of IFN-gamma produced during Francisella infection in vivo remains incomplete, and depletion of NK cells before infection of mice with the F. tularensis live vaccine strain (LVS) has little impact on the course or outcome of infection. In this study, we determined the cell subpopulations that respond quickly to intradermal F. tularensis LVS infection of mice by producing IFN-gamma within hours to a few days. Splenic and liver lymphocytes were obtained from LVS-infected mice and analyzed for IFN-gamma mRNA by reverse transcription-PCR, for intracellular cytokine expression by multiparameter flow cytometry, and for ex vivo production of IFN-gamma protein by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Cells producing IFN-gamma were readily detectable by day 3 after infection, and numbers progressively increased through days 5 to 7. Importantly, the cell types responsible for IFN-gamma production were much more varied than expected: these included not only NK cells and T cells, which might be predicted, but also other cells, including dendritic cells (DCs), "NK DCs," NK T cells, and neutrophils. Most importantly, since RAG-1 knockout mice appeared to exhibit a frequency of IFN-gamma-producing cells comparable to that of intact wild-type mice, early IFN-gamma production by innate immune cells does not depend on the presence of T or B cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial VaccinesDendritic CellsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFlow CytometryFrancisella tularensisGene Expression ProfilingHomeodomain ProteinsInjections, IntradermalInterferon-gammaKiller Cells, NaturalLiverLymphocytesMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLBacterial VaccinesHomeodomain ProteinsInterferon-gammaRAG-1 protein

Identifiers

PMID18573901
PMCPMC2519408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.