Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18572214›Full record

ArticleTheoretical population biology2008

Mathematical properties of the r2 measure of linkage disequilibrium.

Jenna M VanLiere, Noah A Rosenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Theoretical population biology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Placental SNV rs8192446 in theFrontiers in physiology · 2026
    Article
  10. Pharmacogenomic heterogeneity ofAnnals of medicine · 2025
    Observational
  11. Article
  12. On forensic likelihood ratios from low-coverage sequencing.Forensic science international. Genetics · 2025
    Article
  13. Mathematical bounds on rTheoretical population biology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Mathematical bounds onbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jenna M VanLiereCenter for Computational Medicine and Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. jennav@umich.edu
Noah A Rosenberg

Funding

University of Michigan Training Program in Genomic ScienceT32HG000040 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Sebastian Zoellner · 1995 to 2026
$16.4M
Population-Genetic Studies for Association MappingR01GM081441 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ROSENBERG, NOAH · 2007 to 2011
$1.7M
NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG000040NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG00040NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Statistics for linkage disequilibrium (LD), the non-random association of alleles at two loci, depend on the frequencies of the alleles at the loci under consideration. Here, we examine the r(2) measure of LD and its mathematical relationship to allele frequencies, quantifying the constraints on its maximum value. Assuming independent uniform distributions for the allele frequencies of two biallelic loci, we find that the mean maximum value of r(2) is approximately 0.43051, and that r(2) can exceed a threshold of 4/5 in only approximately 14.232% of the allele frequency space. If one locus is assumed to have known allele frequencies--the situation in an association study in which LD between a known marker locus and an unknown trait locus is of interest--we find that the mean maximum value of r(2) is greatest when the known locus has a minor allele frequency of approximately 0.30131. We find that in 1/4 of the space of allowed values of minor allele frequencies and haplotype frequencies at a pair of loci, the unconstrained maximum r(2) allowing for the possibility of recombination between the loci exceeds the constrained maximum assuming that no recombination has occurred. Finally, we use r(max)(2) to examine the connection between r(2) and the D(') measure of linkage disequilibrium, finding that r(2)/r(max)(2)=D('2) for approximately 72.683% of the space of allowed values of (p(a),p(b),p(ab)). Our results concerning the properties of r(2) have the potential to inform the interpretation of unusual LD behavior and to assist in the design of LD-based association-mapping studies.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalGene FrequencyLinkage DisequilibriumRecombination, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID18572214
PMCPMC2580747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.