ReviewSurvey of ophthalmology
The role of infectious agents in the etiology of ocular adnexal neoplasia.
Review in Survey of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 121 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of Intratumoral Microbiota with Prognosis in Patients with Lacrimal Gland Tumor.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Infectious etiologies of conjunctival tumors.Expert review of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Subepithelial Lesions of the Ocular Surface: A Review.Current ophthalmology reports · 2025Review
- Chronic inflammation as a proposed risk factor for ocular surface squamous neoplasia.The ocular surface · 2024Article
- Conjunctival papilloma treatment outcomes: a 12-year-retrospective study.Eye (London, England) · 2023Article
- Investigating the Ocular Surface Microbiome: What Can It Tell Us?Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Review
- Detection of Human Papillomavirus in Squamous Lesions of the Conjunctiva Using RNA and DNA In-Situ Hybridization.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Conjunctival Lesions: A 5-Year Basic Demographic Data and Clinicopathological Review in a Tertiary Eye Care Hospital.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2022Observational
- The Biology of Ocular Adnexal Marginal Zone Lymphomas.Cancers · 2022Review
- Distinctive Tissue and Serum MicroRNA Profile of IgG4-Related Ophthalmic Disease and MALT Lymphoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Current Evidence on the Ocular Surface Microbiota and Related Diseases.Microorganisms · 2020Review
- Epidemiological Analysis and Prognosis of Conjunctival Cancer in the Past Twenty Years: A Population-Based Retrospective Study Using SEER Data.BioMed research international · 2020Article
- Human papillomavirus infection and ocular surface disease (Review).International journal of oncology · 2019Review
- Article
- Ocular surface squamous neoplasia in a patient with AIDS.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2017Article
- Establishment of a combination scoring method for diagnosis of ocular adnexal lymphoproliferative disease.PloS one · 2017Article
- Ocular Surface Squamous Neoplasia Associated with Atopic Keratoconjunctivitis.Ocular oncology and pathology · 2017Article
- Intracorneal and Intraocular Invasion of Ocular Surface Squamous Neoplasia after Intraocular Surgery: Report of Two Cases and Review of the Literature.Ocular oncology and pathology · 2017Article
- Human Microbiota and Ophthalmic Disease.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2016Review
- Nasal dissemination of a single-clone IgH-rearranged conjunctival MALT lymphoma through the nasolacrimal duct: A case report.Oncology letters · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Given the fact that infectious agents contribute to around 18% of human cancers worldwide, it would seem prudent to explore their role in neoplasms of the ocular adnexa: primary malignancies of the conjunctiva, lacrimal glands, eyelids, and orbit. By elucidating the mechanisms by which infectious agents contribute to oncogenesis, the management, treatment, and prevention of these neoplasms may one day parallel what is already in place for cancers such as cervical cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma and gastric adenocarcinoma. Antibiotic treatment and vaccines against infectious agents may herald a future with a curtailed role for traditional therapies of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Unlike other malignancies for which large epidemiological studies are available, analyzing ocular adnexal neoplasms is challenging as they are relatively rare. Additionally, putative infectious agents seemingly display an immense geographic variation that has led to much debate regarding the relative importance of one organism versus another. This review discusses the pathogenetic role of several microorganisms in different ocular adnexal malignancies, including human papilloma virus in conjunctival papilloma and squamous cell carcinoma, human immunodeficiency virus in conjunctival squamous carcinoma, Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpes virus or human herpes simplex virus-8 (KSHV/HHV-8) in conjunctival Kaposi sarcoma, Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori,), Chlamydia, and hepatitis C virus in ocular adnexal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphomas. Unlike cervical cancer where a single infectious agent, human papilloma virus, is found in greater than 99% of lesions, multiple organisms may play a role in the etiology of certain ocular adnexal neoplasms by acting through similar mechanisms of oncogenesis, including chronic antigenic stimulation and the action of infectious oncogenes. However, similar to other human malignancies, ultimately the role of infectious agents in ocular adnexal neoplasms is most likely as a cofactor to genetic and environmental risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.