Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18571478›Full record

ArticleInfection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases2008

Molecular epidemiology of amebiasis.

Ibne Karim M Ali, C Graham Clark, William A Petri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Colonoscopic diagnosis of amebiasis: a case series and systematic review.International journal of colorectal disease · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Standardized RNA extraction protocol forFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Parasite epidemiology and control · 2025
    Article
  5. Theoretical Study of Sphingomyelinases fromPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. First Molecular Identification ofVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. A Review of Colonoscopy in Intestinal Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Hemoglobin uptake and utilization by human protozoan parasites: a review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  13. The Epidemiology ofMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Food and waterborne parasitology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ibne Karim M AliDivision of Infectious Diseases and International Health, University of Virginia Health System, MR4 Building Room 2115, Lane Road, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA. ika3t@virginia.edu
C Graham Clark
William A Petri

Funding

FIELD STUDIES OF IMMUNITY TO AMEBIASIS IN BANGLADESHR01AI043596 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI CAROL A GILCHRIST, William A Petri · 1998 to 2026
$7.7M
NIAID NIH HHS AI043596NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI043596
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Entamoeba histolytica, the causative agent of human amebiasis, remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in developing countries and is responsible for up to 100,000 deaths worldwide each year. Entamoeba dispar, morphologically indistinguishable from E. histolytica, is more common in humans in many parts of the world. Similarly Entamoeba moshkovskii, which was long considered to be a free-living ameba, is also morphologically identical to E. histolytica and E. dispar, and is highly prevalent in some E. histolytica endemic countries. However, the only species to cause disease in humans is E. histolytica. Most old epidemiological data on E. histolytica are unusable as the techniques employed do not differentiate between the above three Entamoeba species. Molecular tools are now available not only to diagnose these species accurately but also to study intra-species genetic diversity. Recent studies suggest that only a minority of all E. histolytica infections progress to the development of clinical symptoms in the host and there exist population level differences between the E. histolytica strains isolated from the asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals. Nevertheless the underlying factors responsible for variable clinical outcome of infection by E. histolytica remain largely unknown. We anticipate that the recently completed E. histolytica genome sequence and new molecular techniques will rapidly advance our understanding of the epidemiology and pathogenicity of amebiasis.

Indexed as

AnimalsEntamoeba histolyticaEntamoebiasisGenetic VariationHIV InfectionsHumansMicrosatellite RepeatsMolecular Epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID18571478
PMCPMC2577599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.